mercredi 31 mai 2017

Priyanka Chopra's sassy reply to trolls over dress controversy

Actress gave it back to the trolls criticising her for wearing a dress showing her legs during her meeting with Prime Minister

The 34-year-old actress shared a photograph on Instagram, flaunting her legs in a high-slit denim dress, along with her mother Madhu, who was dressed in a black top and floral mini skirt.

Priyanka captioned the image, "Legs for days... #itsthegenes with Madhu Chopra nights out in #Berlin #beingbaywatch."

The "Quantico" star, who is currently in the German capital to promote her Hollywood debut "Baywatch", had a meeting with the Indian PM. She wore floral

PM Modi arrived in the country as a part of his his six- day, four-nation tour of Germany, Spain, Russia and France aimed at boosting bilateral economic engagement with them and inviting more investment for India's transformation.

Priyanka wrote on Twitter, "Thank you for taking the time to meet me this morning @narendramodi Sir. Such a lovely coincidence to be in #berlin at the same time.

Priyanka Chopra's sassy reply to trolls over dress controversy

Priyanka Chopra shared a photograph on Instagram, flaunting her legs in a high-slit denim dress

Priyanka Chopra shared a photograph on Instagram, flaunting her legs in a high-slit denim dressActress gave it back to the trolls criticising her for wearing a dress showing her legs during her meeting with Prime Minister

The 34-year-old actress shared a photograph on Instagram, flaunting her legs in a high-slit denim dress, along with her mother Madhu, who was dressed in a black top and floral mini skirt.

Priyanka captioned the image, "Legs for days... #itsthegenes with Madhu Chopra nights out in #Berlin #beingbaywatch."

The "Quantico" star, who is currently in the German capital to promote her Hollywood debut "Baywatch", had a meeting with the Indian PM. She wore floral

PM Modi arrived in the country as a part of his his six- day, four-nation tour of Germany, Spain, Russia and France aimed at boosting bilateral economic engagement with them and inviting more investment for India's transformation.

Priyanka wrote on Twitter, "Thank you for taking the time to meet me this morning @narendramodi Sir. Such a lovely coincidence to be in #berlin at the same time.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Priyanka Chopra's sassy reply to trolls over dress controversy

Going for a job interview? Don't just answer, ask!

Much has been said about what to answer to tough or typical questions. Most of us spend hours rehearsing answers to questions like “Where do you see yourself in 10 years?” or “What makes you a good fit for this company?” But have you spent time thinking about what to ask?

Here are five questions that can help you do just that.


Aside from the requirements mentioned, what other skills or traits would help me as an employee of this company?

You must have applied for this because your resume and experience meet the qualifications. That’s great. But going for an is also the time to gauge whether your personality will work well with your potential colleagues.

Why is this position vacant?

This might seem like an uncomfortable question to ask, but finding out whether the person before you left because of overwork, or moved up the ranks after a promotion, gives you a glimpse of what to expect. 

What is the career path like?

You might be afraid to sound eager with this question, but if you have career ambitions, this is an answer you’d want to hear. If you are eyeing to work at a startup, you might not get the typical “after two years, you can get promoted” answer. 

What is the company’s long-term goal?


Or better yet, ask about a specific timeline. It is especially critical for tech and companies to a have good idea of what they want to achieve, and when they expect to get there because of the limited runway they have. 

What do you love most about working here? 


Asking this question is an opportunity to connect on a deeper level, and to get a unique perspective about the company and its people. 
The job interview: don't just answer, ask!

 

Always remember: you’re not just here to impress, you’re here to be impressed.
This is an excerpt from the article published on Tech In Asia. You can read the full article here

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Going for a job interview? Don't just answer, ask!

mardi 30 mai 2017

Movie review: Wonder Woman reinvigorates tired superhero conventions

“Wonder Woman! All the world’s waiting for you,” rang the theme song to the classic 1970s television show as one-time Miss World America, Lynda Carter, transformed into the star-spangled superhero. Yet while gun-toting raccoons headline today’s superhero movies, the world has waited a long time for its most famous female superhero to receive a dedicated film.

Female superheroes have been confined to sidekick roles (Black Widow is the highest profile Avenger without her own movie) or relegated to TV (where Jessica Jones and Supergirl kick ass on a weekly basis). Gal Gadot as Wonder Woman is the first major female-led superhero movie - and as a hero, her antecedents reach back to the suffragettes.

As historian Jill Lepore details in The Secret History of Wonder Woman, the formative years of Wonder Woman’s creator, psychologist William Moulton Marston, took place against the backdrop of the suffragette movement. As a freshman, he had heard Emmeline Pankhurst speak when she visited Harvard in 1911.

An advocate for women’s rights, Marston would later describe the “blood-curdling masculinity” of comic books as their “worst offence”. His remedy? To create a “feminine character with all the strength of plus all the allure of a good and beautiful woman”. So in October 1941, All Star Comics introduced Wonder Woman, “to whom the problems and feats of men are mere child’s play”.

Marston was married to attorney Elizabeth Holloway Marston, who served as the family’s breadwinner. Later he began a relationship with his research assistant Olive Byrne, who became his life-long partner living with Marston and his wife. Byrne was the daughter of radical feminist Ethel Byrne who, with her sister Margaret Sanger, opened the first birth control clinic in the US (forerunner of today’s Planned Parenthood). It is said that Byrne wore bracelets that inspired Wonder Woman’s bullet-deflecting jewellery. The comic was filled with such feminist iconography, but, as Lepore notes, this was often “feminism as fetish”. Marston’s interest in bondage frequently saw the hero bound and gagged in suggestive poses.

Across her 75-year history, has regularly been depicted scantily clad and in anatomy-defying poses offering the optimum number of angles for leering. This is the tension that each version of the character, including the big-budget film, must reconcile: Is a feminist icon or a pin-up girl masquerading as a satin suffragette?

While one might question the wisdom of entering into battle with little more than a bustier and mini-skirt, director Patty Jenkins’ feature length adheres more closely to Marston’s feminist celebration than the comic’s kinkier elements.

Although the story is repositioned to the trenches of World War I, the adaptation remains largely faithful to the character’s origins. Gadot plays the Amazonian princess who, after saving the life of US serviceman Steve Trevor, leaves the women-only island paradise of Themyscira to aid the allied effort.

Avoiding the easy option of camp or Marvel’s tongue-in-cheek distance, the film’s first act convincingly realises the matriarchal society of warriors. In particular, Robin Wright gives a muscular performance as the Island’s head badass and Wonder Woman’s unforgiving mentor, General Antiope, who trains the future superhero to protect the world from the eventual return of Ares, God of War.

Once the hero leaves the island, the film falls into superhero movie conventions with Wonder Woman’s powers and principles tested as she attempts to unravel a German plot. In particular, the film shares many parallels with the WWII-set Captain America: The First Avenger with the brightly-coloured hero enlivening grey battlefields with the kind of supercharged élan that would have no doubt pleased her original creator.

Like all genre films, superhero movies are built on sameness and difference, and while offers little variation on the box-office tested superhero origin story, the presence of a female hero is enough to reinvigorate tired conventions. There is something doubly heroic in watching lift a tank over her light frame, or crash through armed soldiers to save innocent villagers.

Gadot, a bright spark in the otherwise gruelling Batman V Superman, plays the Amazonian with wide-eyed curiosity, but is careful to avoid ever having the hero appear foolish. Rather, Wonder Woman’s outsider status allows the film to point out the inequities in the patriarchal world, as the hero eschews corsets, barges into men-only meetings, and compares secretarial work to slavery.

While the distance that the film’s WWI setting provides dulls any feminist critique, it will be interesting to see if that same critical lens is applied when Gadot resumes the role of later this year in the modern day Justice League film. For her part, Patty Jenkins’ direction makes no obvious concessions to the hero’s gender nor does she exploit it, with each action sequence filmed much the same as if the was at its centre.

Aided by Jenkins’ assured approach, Gadot manages to navigate the inherent tensions of the character by creating a who is unapologetically glamorous, but also capable and caring.

As the first man ever meets, Steve Trevor (Chris Pine) successfully channels Steve McQueen circa The Great Escape. The charismatic Pine enjoys a playful chemistry with Gadot during the second act culture clash and some genuinely tender moments as the film reaches its CGI-laden conclusion.

While some may see the film’s moments of girl power as a facile gesture on the part of the filmmakers to appease “social justice warriors” rather than a meaningful attempt to redress imbalances of superheroes on screen, the result is still the most successful entry in the otherwise moribund DC shared universe. (Though to describe the film as the best DC or female-led superhero film is to damn with faint praise.)

The Conversation logo

Although it could not hope to shoulder the full weight of 75 years of expectations, no qualifiers are necessary: is an exciting entry in the superhero movie genre.

Wonder Woman, the world’s no longer waiting for you.


opens in cinemas on June 1.

Liam Burke is the author of The Comic Book Film Adaptation: Exploring Modern Hollywood’s Leading Genre.

Liam Burke, Senior Media Studies Lecturer, Swinburne University of Technology

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

The Conversation

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Movie review: Wonder Woman reinvigorates tired superhero conventions

Rich people don't want Ivanka Trump's fashion

At a TJ Maxx discount shop in the shadow of New York’s Queensboro Bridge, there’s little sign of Ivanka Trump’s fashion label. But she’s there.


Dangling next to a bright red Fossil handbag is a single, blush-leather satchel. A flip of the tag reveals a $129 price, about the same as the other bags on the rack. Spread among the jumble are items by Guess?, Nine West Group, Steve Madden, and even a decidedly cheaper option from the Jessica Simpson Collection.

None of this screams luxury, yet that’s the brand image Trump, 35, originally envisioned: An icon of extravagance similar to what her father spent decades trying to build. When she began selling her brand as a fine jewellery label, she looked to Tiffany & Co’s robin egg-blue box and Christian Louboutin’s red-soled pumps for inspiration. She placed Trump wares in the same realm as such storied couture names as Harry Winston and Van Cleef & Arpels. She even opened an opulent boutique on Manhattan’s Madison Avenue.


Somewhere along the way, though, went downmarket. Her label now represents a much more modest image, perhaps recognising exactly where on the retail continuum her products truly reside. At its heart, is a celebrity brand, not a designer fashion house, industry analysts say. It’s the messy discount rack, not the gleaming glass jewellery case. Her company’s moves over the past few years reflect that. And as it turns out, targeting the masses has worked.

“Celebrities, as a branding tool, appeal more to the mass than luxury,” said Allen Adamson, the New York-based founder of consulting firm BrandSimple. “The further downmarket she goes, the more horsepower her brand potentially has.”

The pivot began in late 2010, when Trump started her footwear and clothing businesses. She chose to go after a much-less-glossy group of people, discarding four-digit price tags in favour of numbers more on par with the broader market. US President Donald Trump’s election last year accelerated that shift. After losing her most glamourous retail partners amid the controversies and boycotts that have marked her father’s tempest-tossed administration, she halted production of the diamond jewellery that was her only remaining fashion business. 


Her executives decided to nix the Fine Jewellery Collection in March in order to create a more cohesive brand. Gem-laden necklaces at $10,000 didn’t make a whole lot of sense for a brand that also peddles discount heels at DSW-a low-price shoe warehouse. In its place is a “fashion jewellery” collection sold at Lord & Taylor stores and online. There’s no solid gold or diamonds: Some items are available on sale for as little as $11.

How far downmarket has gone? Bloomberg compiled pricing data from her brand, and compared it with those of other labels known for work-wear, using three office essentials as illustrations: Pumps, tote bags, and sheath dresses. Trump has long promoted her clothes as work-appropriate garb the working woman can afford.

The label now clocks in alongside mall staples Banana Republic and Ann Taylor, brands far from the luxury segment. Above Trump sits DKNY, the mid-market diffusion line created by designer Donna Karen. Luxury brand Burberry, meanwhile, is out of her league. Other fashion houses such as Prada carry even higher price ranges. (A spokesperson for the Trump brand didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.)

Back in the summer of 2010, a few months prior to her shoes hitting store shelves, held court at Trump Tower in New York, hosting retail buyers and members of the press eager for a look at her new collection. Marc Fisher Footwear, maker and distributor of her shoes, happened to be located in the same building.

In a showroom, she displayed a wide selection of styles, from high heels to sneakers, with retail prices spanning $60 to $160. The initial feedback was strong enough to prompt Trump to push up the line’s timing from the following spring. Nordstrom and Bloomingdale’s were among the retailers to get on board.

Her apparel line, a partnership with G-III Apparel Group, came next. In February 2011, it landed on department store racks, featuring $80 blouses and $200 jackets. Trump said she wanted the clothes to exude “timeless glamour” despite the mid-level pricing. 

“I wanted the price points to be accessible,” Trump said as she was hyping her new apparel line six years ago, “but ultimately we’re in the business of luxury, and these looks are consistent with that larger messaging.”


It was 2011, and shoppers wanted Business boomed. Her clothing line grew to a $100 million business by flaunting the counter-intuitive promise of “affordable luxury.” She expanded into home goods and fragrances as her label entered more stores. As the company grew, glamourous jewellery gave way to mass-market merchandise. Items emblazoned with Ivanka Trump’s IT logo are now sold via the online marketplaces of Wal-Mart Stores, Kmart, and Sears brands.

Executives told Refinery29 in March that the brand’s average customers are aged from 25 to 40, with an annual income of $60,000 to $100,000-far from the sort of shoppers who shell out thousands of dollars for gem-encrusted necklaces.


Let's block ads! (Why?)

Rich people don't want Ivanka Trump's fashion

Addicted to smartphones? Too much texting may lead to 'smartphone thumb'

People who spend too much time may be at increased risk of having "smartphone thumb", a painful condition caused by repetitive movements of typing that may lead to arthritis in the thumb, doctors have warned.

Formally known as tendinitis, the condition was earlier only seen in It causes the tendon that bends and flexes the thumb to become inflamed.

But with increased use of smartphone for our daily activities, this type of pain has become more common over the years in the US, according to a CBSNews.com report.


"One of the hypotheses is that, you know, the joints get loose and lax, and because of that the kind of move differently than they would in a normal situation," Kristin Zhao, a biomedical engineer at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester was quoted as saying by CBS Minnesota.

The movements we require our thumbs to make as we hold our phones are awkward, Zhao said.

"It's also a movement that requires some force through the thumbs. It's not just free movement in space," she explained.


"Our hypothesis is that abnormal motion of in the thumb could be causing pain onset and eventual osteoarthritis," Zhao said.

The ways to prevent the problem include giving your thumbs a break, using your forefinger sometimes, and doing daily stretching exercises to keep your limber, among others.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Addicted to smartphones? Too much texting may lead to 'smartphone thumb'

Arundhati Roy's second novel is a powerful elegy for bulldozed world

Nilanjana S Roy reviews The Ministry of Utmost Happiness

Arundhati Roy, The Ministry of Utmost HappinessArundhati Roy, The Ministry of Utmost Happiness
The Ministry of Utmost Happiness
Author: Arundhati Roy
Publisher: Penguin Random House
No. of pages: 464 pages
Price: Rs 599
 
In the same week that I began reading Arundhati Roy’s second novel, The Ministry of Utmost Happiness, I came across an old interview between and The Paris Review.
 
He says: “It always amuses me that the biggest praise for my work comes for the imagination, while the truth is that there’s not a single line in all my work that does not have a basis in reality. The problem is that Caribbean reality resembles the wildest imagination.”
 
The challenge faced by the novelist who inhabits a tumultuous country going through interesting times: How do you make up a world that can compete with the truth? One way is to lie outright, become a fabulist – but lies are now firmly the preserve of the fake-news expert, not the novelist.
 
Before the book’s release, a story was circulated about on a news site notorious for its hazy grasp of facts. It triggered a familiar sort of controversy – the abusive outrage of online mobs as they zero in on the target of the moment, amplified by the bully-pulpit shouting of television anchors who can speak only in finger-wagging indictments. But the story proved to be a lie. Which raises the interesting question of whether the emotions felt by the outraged and the vengeful were also, then, a form of fiction.
 
For novelists, one approach is to form a defensive alliance with reality – relying on a truthful background, layering actual history with news headlines, doing deep dives into the antecedents of your (non-existent) characters, to create fiction. The Ministry of Utmost Happiness establishes itself in this camp with its first page, an elegy for the disappearing vultures, the “friendly old birds” whose passing, from diclofenac poisoning, goes barely noticed by people who have “so much else to look forward to”.
 
The first guide through the dense and teeming terrain of this 464-page novel is Anjum, who becomes Delhi’s most famous hijra over the years. She finds her way after a series of adventures to a graveyard, which is clearly meant to be far more full of life than the rest of the city. She and her graveyard guild have learnt one truth: Once you fall off the edge of things, you will hold on to other falling people.
 
They take the story through the waning influence of the previous prime minister, the Trapped Rabbit, to the chest-thumping rule of the Parakeet Reich. The mystery of a baby – unpropitiously dark – who appears right next to the Mothers of the Disappeared, in the protest bazaar at Jantar Mantar, connects Anjum and her city with the other parts of the novel.
 
Three men with overlapping lives are linked by their differing relationships with the same woman – S Tilottoma, who has slightly slanting cat’s eyes, an inability to be placed by the usual Indian norms (“she didn’t seem to have a past, a family, a community, a people or even a home”) and who is by turns a delightfully enigmatic, or thoroughly exasperating, free spirit.
 
The men whose lives are intertwined with hers are also shaped by and its tangled, bloody conflicts – “Garson Hobart”, the urbane government man, Naga, the narcissistic, charismatic journalist whose compromises place others in danger, and Musa, the earnest, idealistic Kashmiri who becomes a militant.
 
If this was all – a story, held together by brutality and perhaps love, a Delhi story, told by an inhabitant so iconic of the city as to be a stereotype – The Ministry of Utmost Happiness would be a baroque and unsatisfying performance.
 
But the great pleasure of reading Ministry is its intricacy, the profusion of lives woven together into a massive tapestry. Some of the most striking passages are about what we used to call “sideys”, side-characters, or tiny sketches, from the origin of the Jannat Guest House and Funeral Services (for the assistance of those whom the graveyards and crematoriums turn away), to the child Miss Jebeen substituting “Mataji” for the chant of “Azaadi” to make her mother turn to her and give her a kiss, to the rescuer-victim identities of an army officer whose story shapeshifts when he moves to Canada. There are two striking mother-and-daughter pairs in the novel, both unconventional, both heart-breaking, and they give Ministry its strong emotional core.
 
Many will read Ministry as non-fiction, seeking to outrage over the sections, or the capsule edits Roy offers on Indian politics and the rise of Hindutva. People who favour this approach read novels like test papers, with censoring grades to be handed out to writers – A+, D- or Fs for Fail. An aside to the outrage brigade: It’s often the most bitter critics who become the novelist’s best publicists.
 
If there is a guardian spirit hovering over Ministry, it is the ghost of the renegade mystic Sarmad, beheaded for refusing to bow to the pieties of his time. Ministry has a forebear in Thomas Hardy’s novels – written in a similar vein of deep foreboding, his pessimism and disillusionment clashing with his awareness of the human urge to reach for lust and life.
 
These threads, bringing together the lives of those who fall outside the grand arc of official and unofficial histories, at first seem decorative. But it is these tumultuous marginal lives, not all of them human, and the brilliant digressions around “sideys” that made this novel come to life.
 
Its worst flaws: Some characters veer dangerously close to cliché, and the flavour of news reports, human rights report – the handy explainer, the useful summary – works its way into the more ambitious sections. Despite that, this is a powerful second novel – an elegy for a bulldozed world, Ms Roy’s instincts placing her once again on the side of the outcasts, challenging Delhi’s infamous “insider” culture by foregrounding a far more interesting set of city insiders.
 
At its best, The Ministry of Utmost Happiness can be miraculous in its ability to evoke a thousand small acts of tenderness and everyday pleasures. These are often all that people who are not warriors by nature have as weapons to defend themselves against a time of brutal certainties and rising rage. For all her dark materials, Ministry ends on a note of hope: you can almost believe that things might turn out all right in the end.
 
Email:

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Arundhati Roy's second novel is a powerful elegy for bulldozed world

lundi 29 mai 2017

Cannes Champions

Swedish film The Square took the Palme d’Or prize, while became only the second-ever female director to win Best Director. Other winners included Nicole Kidman, who picked up Cannes’ 70th anniversary award and Joaquin Phoenix, who won Best Actor for his part in You Were Never Really Here. Here are some of the winners from the 2017 Film Festival:
Cannes 2017

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Cannes Champions

Five cups of coffee daily may halve liver cancer risk: study

Drinking about five cups of every day may halve the risk of developing the most common form of liver cancer, new research has claimed.

Researchers from the and the in the UK found that the more consumed the greater the protection against (HCC).

Drinking one cup more of caffeinated a day was associated with a 20 per cent reduction in the risk of developing HCC, two cups more with a 35 per cent reduction, and up to five cups with a halving of the risk.

The protection was found to be the same for both existing coffee-drinkers and those who did not usually drink it, and the more consumed the greater the effect - although there was little data available above five cups a day.

Decaffeinated was also found to have a beneficial, though less marked, effect, researchers said.

The study, published in the journal BMJ Open, examined the data from 26 observational studies, involving more than 2.25 million participants, to calculate the relative risks of developing HCC for drinking between one and five cups of caffeinated a day.

" is widely believed to possess a range of health benefits, and these latest findings suggest it could have a significant effect on liver cancer risk," said Oliver Kennedy, from the

"Our findings are an important development given the increasing evidence of HCC globally and its poor prognosis," said Kennedy.

HCC is the second leading cause of cancer death globally due to its poor prognosis and high frequency, especially in China and Southeast Asia. It mostly develops in people who are already suffering from a chronic liver disease.

It is estimated that, by 2030, the number of new cases annually will have risen by about 50 per cent to more than 1.2 million.

The compound molecules found in possess antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anticarcinogenic and other beneficial properties which scientists believe may explain the lower rates of chronic liver disease and liver cancer experienced by coffee-drinkers, researchers said.

About 2.25 billion cups of are consumed daily worldwide, and increased consumption has already been shown to protect against serious non-cancer chronic liver disease (cirrhosis).

"We have shown that reduces cirrhosis and also liver cancer in a dose-dependent manner. has also been reported to reduce the risk of death from many other causes," said Peter Hayes, from the

"Our research adds to the evidence that, in moderation, can be a wonderful natural medicine," said Hayes.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Five cups of coffee daily may halve liver cancer risk: study

Baahubali franchise's animation spin-off to make TV debut on Colors

"Baahubali: The Lost Legends", an animated spin-off of filmmaker S S Rajamoulis "Baahubali" film franchise, will soon make its debut on the small screen to enthral viewers with the story of Baahubali, the king of fictional kingdom Mahishmati.

After releasing the series on Amazon Prime Video, Rajamouli, Graphic India and have joined hands with channel to expand the world of "Baahubali".

"'Baahubali' has proved to be a landmark film in the history of Indian cinema. Its success is nothing short of a case study for the Indian filmmakers. We at pride ourselves for knowing the pulse of our viewers," Raj Nayak, chief operating officer (COO), Viacom18, said in a statement.

"Going by the ripples that this masterpiece has generated nationwide, we thought this was the right time to bring to our television audiences the folklores of 'Baahubali' which have been captured stunningly in this animated series," he added.

"Baahubali: The Lost Legends" has been created by Rajamouli, Sharad Devarajan and

said: "The reach of television as a medium in India is extraordinary, and we're thrilled to partner with Raj Nayak and to bring the untold stories of the Mahishmati kingdom to the television audiences.

Our creation of the series with Graphic India and Sharad Devarajan was formed on the idea that we could launch an animated series that would go beyond just kids. With the channel's distribution platform, we will be able to bring 'Baahubali: The Lost Legends' to the millions of people in India from ages eight to eighty."

" 2: The Conclusion", the second installment in the franchise, is currently having a golden run in theatres. Released on April 28, it minted over Rs 1500 crore so far.

"The paradigm shift that 'Baahubali' has brought into the entertainment industry is truly inspiring for all of us, and now with 'Baahubali: The Lost Legends' fans of the film can continue to live the journey of Baahubali, Bhallaladeva and all their other favourite characters," said Shobu Yarlagadda, chief executive officer (CEO),

Sharad Devarajan, Co-Founder and CEO, Graphic India, said: "The epic storytelling and groundbreaking visuals that S S created has captivated millions, and the future of Indian cinema shall now always be defined as 'before Baahubali' and 'after Baahubali'."

A premiere date for "Baahubali: The Lost Legends" is yet to be announced.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Baahubali franchise's animation spin-off to make TV debut on Colors

'The Square' bags Palme D'Or, Sofia Coppola Best Director at Cannes

Director Ruben Ostlund walked away with the Film Festival's highest honour as his "The Square", an art world satire that stars Claes Bang, Elisabeth Moss and Dominic West, won this year's Palme d'Or here.

When Ostlund did not get an Oscar nomination in 2015, he good-naturedly released a video that included what he called a "worst man cry".

On Sunday night, the Swedish director took a different tack as he rejoiced in his win. He asked photographers in the pit below the stage at the Lumiere Theatre to turn their cameras on the audience and led all attendees in a primal scream "of happiness".

He said: "I can direct you now, after all I won the Palme d'Or."

Other winners included Diane Kruger as Best Actress for her first German-language turn in Fatih Akin's "In the Fade", a timely story of the aftermath of a terrorist bombing, reports deadline.com.

The actress, who works largely in French and American cinema, gave a shout-out to those affected by terrorism, particularly the folks left behind.

To those "who have to go on living" after losing someone, she said, "please know you are not forgotten".

Joaquin Phoenix was named Best Actor for "You Were Never Really Here". He sported Converse sneakers, apologising that his proper shoes already had been sent home.

Joaquin Phoenix

Jury member and presenter Jessica Chastain, with Actor Joaquin Phoenix who won the Best Actor award for his role in the film You Were Never Really Here, gestures as photographers ask for Phoenix to hold the trophy during the awards ceremony at the 70

The Amazon Studios title also won Best Screenplay for writer-director Lynne Ramsay, who shared that nod in a tie with Yorgos Lanthimos and Efthymis Filippou for "The Killing of a Sacred Deer".

Actress Nicole Kidman was awarded a special 70th anniversary award. She sent a video message from Nashville saying she was "devastated" for not being present at the event.

"Last week was like a dream. This is a lovely way to come back to the dream," Kidman said.

Among her acknowledgements was Sofia Coppola, in whose movie "The Beguiled" Kidman starred.

Coppola, also absent from the Palais gala, was named Best Director for the film. She sent a message honouring, among others, her mother and father, director Francis Ford Coppola who made "The Godfather" trilogy.

This is the second time in the festival's history that a woman has won this prize, following Yuliya Solntseva for "The Story of the Flaming Years" back in 1961.

In other big wins, Andrey Zvyagintsev's "Loveless", won the Jury Prize. And, Robin Campillo's AIDS activist drama "120 Beats Per Minute" picked up the Grand Prize.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

'The Square' bags Palme D'Or, Sofia Coppola Best Director at Cannes

Irrfan Khan makes Instagram debut, shares memories of younger days pics

Actor has made his debut on and shared throwback images from his younger days in which he recreates some iconic poses from

The 50-year-old actor posted two black-and-white pictures on his recently created photo sharing account.

The first picture shows Irrfan and a friend mimicking the classic "Sholay" pose where veteran actor sits on a whistling Amitabh Bachchan's shoulders and plays the harmonica.

The "Hindi Medium" actor captioned the image as, "This is our poster inspired by the # poster. #FilmyInfluence."

In the second photograph, Irrfan can be seen riding a horse, dressed up like India's first superstar, Rajesh Khanna.

"Somebody told me that to be an actor you must know horse riding... So whenever I went to ride (or learn to ride - which I didn't at that time), I made it a point that when I sat on the horse... My look would be inspired by Rajesh Khannaji... Hero toh banna hi tha! (Had to become a hero some day) #FilmyInfluence," wrote Irrfan.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Irrfan Khan makes Instagram debut, shares memories of younger days pics

BCCI says no bilateral cricket with Pak till terror remains

Board of Control for Cricket in (BCCI) official Rajeev Shukla on Monday reiterated that will not play any bilateral series with without getting consent from the central

"We talked to Vijay Goel. And it is very clear that we will play against only in the tournaments," Shukla told ANI.

will face arch-rivals in the Champions Trophy encounter to be played at Edgbaston on June 4.

"But we are not playing any bilateral series with unless we get a nod from the government," he insisted.

Earlier in the day, Union Minister Vijay Goel asserted that there cannot be a bilateral series between and until there is from the Pakistani side.

" should come out with a proposal on only after consultations with the I have already made it clear that any bilateral series with is almost impossible because there cannot be relations between the two countries until there is from the Pakistani side," Goel said while talking to reporters.

" and cannot go hand in hand," he added.

Supporting the Minister's views, Shukla said, "I completely support the Union Minister's views."

acting secretary Amithabh Chaudhry, along with the members of the Supreme Court-appointed Committee of Administrators (CoA), will today meet Cricket Board </a>(PCB) chairman Shaharyar Khan in Dubai.

The PCB had earlier this month sent a legal notice to its Indian counterpart for failing to honour the MoU signed between the two cricket boards in 2014.

The PCB had also demanded compensation close to USD 60 million from the for not honouring the MoU signed when N. Srinivasan was at the helm of affairs in the Indian board.

According to the 2014 agreement, was scheduled to play six series against Pakistan, four of them were going to be Pakistan's home series, subject to clearance from the of

The two Asian neighbours have not played a full bilateral series after the Mumbai terror attacks in November 2008.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

BCCI says no bilateral cricket with Pak till terror remains

'Sachin: A Billion Dreams' mints over Rs 27 cr in opening weekend

Legendary cricketer Sachin Tendulkar's documentary drama film Sachin: A Billion Dreams has collected Rs 27.85 crore in its opening weekend at the box office, according to makers.

The film released on May 26 in Hindi, Marathi, Tamil, Telugu and English.

Sachin: A Billion Dreams records exceptional collections for a bio-drama, mints Rs 27.85 crore (all languages) in its opening weekend," read a statement issued on behalf of the film's makers.

The film, despite being in competition with previously released big entertainers like Baahubali 2: The Conclusion, Half Girlfriend and Hindi Medium, and Hollywood film Pirates of the Caribbean: Salazar's Revenge, has managed to make its presence felt at the box office despite its unique genre, said trade expert Taran Adarsh.

Sachin: A Billion Dreams has a wonderful opening weekend. Generally, docu-dramas have dim prospects at box office, but this one is an exception, Adarsh tweeted on Monday.

Sachin: A Billion Dreams faced a tough opponent in the Hollywood biggie Pirates Of The Caribbean, but it proved no opposition, frankly," he added.

Narrated by Sachin himself, the film takes viewers on an inspirational journey and tells how a Mumbai-based local boy went on to become the "God of Cricket". It features various photographs and videos from Sachin's past and includes interviews of his fellow cricketers and family members.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

'Sachin: A Billion Dreams' mints over Rs 27 cr in opening weekend

dimanche 28 mai 2017

Crude truths in the Gulf of Mexico

THE GULF

The Making of an American Sea

Jack E Davis

Liveright Publishing

Illustrated; 592 pages; $29.95


For those who live distant from it, of Mexico made its most vivid appearance on the national stage for all the wrong reasons: the biggest accidental oil spill ever to occur in offshore waters. The 2010 Deepwater Horizon blowout poured 4.9 million barrels of crude into the gulf, damaged beaches and coastal estuaries, and poisoned marine life up and down the food chain, from algae to dolphins. The burning drill rig and underwater plume of hydrocarbons was a media sensation, an unfolding crisis replete with stunning pictures and a herculean mobilisation of humans and technology.

In Jack E Davis’s sprightly and sweeping new history, The Gulf: The Making of an American Sea, the spill is both culmination and footnote to five centuries of restless human energies. The largest gulf and 10th-largest body of water on earth, it began forming 150 million years ago, after the breakup of the supercontinent Pangea. Its depth and breadth have fluctuated over the ensuing eons: Its northern tides once lapped shoreline in present-day Illinois. In its current configuration it touches more than 3,000 miles of mainland coast along five American states and six in Mexico, and supports a commercial fishery worth three-quarters of a billion dollars in landings revenue annually.


In Davis’s hands, the story reads like a watery version of the history of the American West. Both places saw Spanish incursions from the south, mutual incomprehension in the meeting of Europeans and aboriginals, waves of disease that devastated the natives and a relentless quest by the newcomers for the raw materials of empire. There were scoundrels and hucksters, booms and busts, senseless killing in sublime landscapes and a tragic belief in the inexhaustible bounty of nature. A few artists and eccentrics fought to preserve the ecology of the place and sometimes succeeded. Whereas the West was re-engineered to account for a shortage of water, of Mexico was re-engineered to account for a surfeit of oil.

It was the rumour of gold and silver that caused the first Europeans to probe gulf waters. Many met with shipwreck and starvation, even as a native culture thrived along the coastal estuaries, feasting on that bounteous supply of seafood. Despite their complex communication networks and endlessly renewable source of protein, the natives were destroyed in the blink of an eye. Mostly it was the newcomers’ pathogens that did them in, although some were victims of an attitude that viewed them as “artless and lazy” for not exploiting their material abundance for purposes of commerce.


Although region harboured no gold, it possessed astonishing riches of bird life. Davis, the author of “An Everglades Providence,” recounts “one of the bloodiest crimes committed against wildlife in modern times,” the slaughter of plumage birds for feathered hats in the 19th century. The killing got so out of hand that the gulf’s population of snowy egrets dipped below the population of the endangered American bison. Five million birds annually fed the hat business, leaving with a mere 10 percent of its previous number of plume birds by the beginning of the 20th century.

Likewise, oyster beds were scoured and permanently damaged, and shrimp populations were hit hard by the introduction of innovative seafood-harvesting methods like the seine net. New laws and a dawning environmental consciousness helped curtail the worst abuses of commercial fishing, but in Davis’s reckoning, one practice in particular changed forever: the pursuit of tarpon. Sport fishing brought waves of tourists to the water, all of whom required hotels, restaurants and waterside pavilions for dancing, drinking and swapping tall tales of grappling with the great silver monsters of the sea. First railroads and later highways conveyed sporty types to and from  

The 20th century accelerated the changes. On the gulf’s eastern shores, developers dredged and filled marshes and estuaries in order to sell a slice of spoiled paradise to Northern transplants. On the western side, industry took hold with the discovery of oil in 1901 at Spindletop in Texas, and oil soon became a major gulf resource. By the end of the century 181,000 wells had been sunk on- and offshore in Louisiana alone, and more than 70,000 miles of pipeline right of way had been secured to transport oil and gas through the state’s marshes. Denuded of its wetlands and mangrove forests from Texas to Florida, much of the coastline started slumping into the sea.

It is a sad story well told — although I should confess I began the book sceptical of being entertained and edified by 592 pages about a body of water that has come to be used like a sump for the wastes of industry. My doubts proved unwarranted. Davis has written a beautiful homage to a neglected sea, a lyrical paean to its remaining estuaries and marshes, and a marvellous mash-up of human and environmental history. He has also given us the story of how a once gorgeous place was made safe for the depredations of the petrochemical age. How it was made safe from petrochemicals is a book I look forward to reading.
 

©2017 The New York Times News Service

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Crude truths in the Gulf of Mexico

Ferarri's Vettel wins Monaco GP, Raikonen finishes at close second

Ferrari's German driver on Sunday won the Formula One Grand Prix, followed closely by his Finnish team-mate Kimi Raikkonen.

With this, his second ever win at Monte Carlo, having won it last in 2011, Vettel notched his third victory of the season, following his success at the Bahrain and Australia Grand Prix. He now has a total of 45 wins, reports Efe.

Furthermore, victory in opened up his lead over Mercedes' British driver Lewis Hamilton who came in seventh place and stands at 104 points in the season's rankings, behind 1st place Vettel with 129 points.

Raikkonen's second place finish means Ferrari will take the first and second spots on the podium.

Red Bull's Australian driver, Daniel Ricciardo, took the third place.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Ferarri's Vettel wins Monaco GP, Raikonen finishes at close second

Pakistani speedster takes dig at Kohli, says not afraid of Indian skipper

Ahead of the much awaited high-voltage India- encounter in the upcoming on June 4 at Edgbaston, Pakistani speedster has taken a dig at skipper Virat Kohli, saying his team is not afraid of the swashbuckling Indian batsman and they know how to tackle him.

Junaid said Kohli is a great batsman but has failed against his pace in the past.

"I have dismissed him in three out of the four matches we have faced each other. He is a brilliant batsman but he has failed against me," Junaid told The Express Tribune. "I bowled Kohli in in front of his fans so it won't be a problem in England."

Both Junaid and Kohli have faced-off quite a few times in the past and the 28-year-old Indian batsman has managed to score just 2 runs off his 22 balls in ODIs.

The Pakistani speedster thus feels he has the psychological advantage over Kohli and will be looking to use that to his advantage.

"When I face him, I will consider him the same Kohli. I may be wrong but I think he will also think of me as the same Junaid that has taken his wicket before, which might make him go on the defensive a bit more and therefore lose his wicket," said the 27-year-old.

"He has been hitting sixes and fours all over the world but none of them has come against me, which is an honour for me and I will try to keep that record intact in the upcoming Champions Trophy," he added.

The left-arm pacer also revealed that he has been working on his swing. Interestingly, the Men in Green have defeated Team in four out of five matches in which Junaid has played.

"I have been working on my swing, which is my speciality and my biggest weapon, since many of my seniors have told me that my swing has gotten weaker," he said.

"However, Kohli is not the only good player in their side and my focus will be on all of their batsmen. I have been watching their videos and have prepared myself to face them too," he added.

While hold a 2-1 lead over their fierce rivals and neighbours in the Champions Trophy, it is who have won 10 out of the 11 contests at the World Cup and World T20 tournaments between the two sides.

The Indian cricket team, who won the coveted title back in 2013, couldn't have found a better opponent than arch-rivals to begin their title defence in England and Wales.

The Virat Kohli-led side, who are the defending champions, will be the more confident side going into this tournament, which begins from June 1.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Pakistani speedster takes dig at Kohli, says not afraid of Indian skipper

Baahubali mania: Mindless frenzy around the Prabhas film is a worrying sign

Since the last four weeks, the most read stories on this newspaper’s website have been the myriad ones on the kind of money 2 has been minting at the box office. At a time when the country is in the grip of mob lynchings and a new tax system where renewables (18 per cent) are taxed more than coal (5 per cent) and sanitary napkins are taxed at 12 per cent while sindoor is tax free, it’s fascinating that people are obsessed with following the box office conquests of a frankly unspectacular movie.

As someone who hails from coastal Andhra, my heart swells that finally Telugu cinema is being recognised in the Hindi-speaking parts of the country without being subsumed under that hideous rubric called “Madrasi cinema”. But I wish the industry was recognised for something more compelling than a lethargic movie that rightly is — to quote a website’s headline —”three hours of porn”. But is not exactly Telugu cinema. The characters could have come from anywhere in Indian mythology. Comparisons with quintessential Telugu gems like Maya Bazaar, Daana Veera Soora Karna are uncalled for.

Director S S Rajamouli is a one-trick pony but that trick might just rock your 180-minute existence at the cinema, if you are in an easy-to-please mood, that is. Right from his debut 16 years ago, Student No.1, Rajamouli has been the master of interval bangs. Each movie of his moves along sedately in the first half, until things hit a deafening crescendo in the pre-interval sequence only to put its eager audience back into a lull. I still get gooseflesh when my inadvertent nocturnal YouTubing activity involves me gaping at the intermission parts of Simhadri, Vikramarkudu, Magadheera or Chhatrapati. The movies don’t even stand up to Rajamouli’s underwhelming standards. However, the franchise ought to be a case study at Ivy League B-schools. In 1960s, a clever person posted an ad in The New York Times asking for a dollar from the public for a secret that he would reveal days later. He got truckloads of dollars only to reveal that there was no secret in the first place and to prove public can be conned 
when marketing strategy is spot on. Rajamouli did something similar with his “Why Kattappa killed ” question. It was the biggest moment in the sclerotic Indian pop culture history after Shah Rukh Khan’s “lungi dance”. Alas, the answer to that all-important question had coitus interruptus written all over it. Not a single person I know was blown away by the revelation but then, you pay for your ticket upfront.

It’s a minor tragedy that while mainstream English media was salivating over 2 and its collections, not even a footnote was reserved for K Vishwanath, who got the award earlier this month. Here’s a man who made the country’s most progressive cinema like Shankarabharanam, Swati Mutyam, Saagara Sangamam, Saptapadi, Sirivennela, to name a few of his outstanding works. Barring Telugu media, where his works have been discussed threadbare to a beautiful effect, the English media has been near silent. Ignorance isn’t always bliss when media is basically co-opting in making the audience choose junk food over fresh fruits and leafy vegetables. This is basically capitalism at its despicable best.

In a New Statesman piece titled “In Defence of Philistinism”, Yo Zushi says that canons are formed by critical consensus and that none of the five most profitable films — Avatar, Titanic, Star Wars: the Force Awakens, Jurassic World and The Avengers — are by any means canonical. You’ve probably seen them, but don’t feel guilty, says the writer. “They are, to be frank, dumb and devoid of complexity yet millions of people love them,” writes Yo. Unlike West, here we seem to forget that “event movies” are not cinema and that they cater to the basest human instincts, like Fast and Furious. The whole hype surrounding Rajamouli’s magnum crapus reminded me of a line from Robert Musil’s The Man Without Qualities, which I am poring over at the moment: “Much of a man’s importance lies in his ability to make himself understood by his contemporaries.”

I hope against hope that Indian film-makers don’t take their future cue from the creator of this insufferable franchise.


Let's block ads! (Why?)

Baahubali mania: Mindless frenzy around the Prabhas film is a worrying sign

samedi 27 mai 2017

Inconvenient truth for India in Al Gore's documentary?

has moved centre stage with regard to talks across the world, thanks to its ambitious renewable energy and energy efficiency targets. So when former vice-president of the US and activist brings out a sequel to his Oscar-winning AnInconvenient Truth this year, it would come as no surprise if gets a good mention in it.

The real surprise, however, is the way has been mentioned in the film titled An Inconvenient Sequel: Truth to Power, first shown at the Sundance Film Festival in the US in January and then at the international film festival at Cannes in May. A Press Trust of India (PTI) review first referred to it as a “powerful new documentary film, which gives India’s part in the climate change movement a starring role,” and then said, “at one point, the film shows Prime Minister Narendra Modi, in his speech at the November 2015 Paris Climate Conference, insisting on continuing with conventional energy so as not to put up barriers in the path of development.” is even referred to as “the biggest holdout in the negotiations” in the documentary, PTI reported. A holdout is an entity that resists something or refuses to accept an offer.

An earlier review by The Guardian in January 2017 said, “...While the movie never quite gets into the specifics of the (Paris) agreement, it positions India’s prime minister, Narendra Modi, as a villain whose economic impulses stand in direct threat to the progress the summit represents...” The paper added: “This film suggests that Gore’s back channel networking saves the day, and maybe the world.”


If the trailers are anything to go by, doesn’t get any mention except a two-second clip of Prakash Javadekar, then environment minister of India, during the Paris Climate Change Summit, 2015. During the summit, not only announced an ambitious target of sourcing 40 per cent of its power demand from renewable sources by 2030, but also re-iterated its right to use fossil fuel to meet the growing energy demand.

“The base load in is coal. It cannot be anything else as we don't have gas and without a base load we can’t even do renewable energy. We are a developing nation. We are rapidly creating infrastructure, setting up manufacturing, creating jobs for our people, setting up homes, all of which the United States and the European nations did in the last 150 years on the back of low carbon base or coal-based energy,” Piyush Goyal, minister of state for coal, mines, power and new & renewable energy had said during the 2015 Paris summit.

India’s stand was widely criticised, especially by the US, when John Kerry, the then US secretary of state, said would be a challenge at the summit as it continues to source cheaper coal-based power. This statement of Kerry is featured in the film, going by The Hindu’s review published on Tuesday.

“Through India, the film also addresses the developing-versus-developed-world debate over carbon emission and energy issues. There is Piyush Goyal (in a footage of a meeting with in Delhi) asking for the right to the same carbon space that the developed world has been occupying for 150 years,” said the review by The Hindu.

In November 2015, when Paris negotiations were going on, Goyal was reportedly saying, “Having already developed their nations, they have now realised the inconvenient truth after finding low-cost shale gas. I think it's very important that the world recognises what Prime Minister Narendra Modi articulated as convenient action.”

Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth won documentary Oscar in 2007. Some predictions made in the documentary such as ocean water flooding New York City turned out to be true.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Inconvenient truth for India in Al Gore's documentary?

Tendulkar's film earns Rs 8.40 cr on opening day in India

"Sachin: A Billion Dreams", a documentary drama on ace Indian cricketer Sachin Tendulkar, registered an opening day collection of Rs 8.40 crore, according to the makers.

The film released on Friday in Hindi, Marathi, Tamil, Telugu and English.


"Sachin: A Billion Dreams creates history as docu-drama. Biggest opening in the genre with Rs 8.40 crore in in all languages," read a statement issued on behalf of the film's makers.

According to trade analyst Taran Adarsh, it is an "impressive" opening for a film in this genre.


The movie takes viewers through Tendulkar's journey in his personal and professional life. It features the himself as he lets his fans into parts of his life they may not have known yet.

Members of the film and sports fraternity have already given the tale a thumbs up.

Responding to the praise coming his way on Twitter, Tendulkar wrote in one post: "For me, it's always about intention rather than expectation. We gave it our 100 per cent. So glad you liked it."


Let's block ads! (Why?)

Tendulkar's film earns Rs 8.40 cr on opening day in India

vendredi 26 mai 2017

'Sachin: A Billion Dreams' made tax-free in Maharashtra

The Maharashtra government has decided to waive off the entertainment on master blaster Sachin Tendulkar's biopic 'Sachin

The state government took this decision to honour the contribution of Tendulkar in the world of sports and to ensure that the film reaches maximum number of people in the theatres.

The docu-drama, which is based on the personal and professional life of the 44-year-old cricketer, has been written and directed by British filmmaker James Erskine.

The flick also reveals few aspects of his life that were never heard before.

The movie, which was simultaneously shot in Hindi, Marathi and English, has also been declared tax-free in Odisha, Kerala, and Karnataka.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

'Sachin: A Billion Dreams' made tax-free in Maharashtra

The kinder clothes

In the Garden of Eden, figuring out what to wear was easy and the fig leaves were environmentally friendly. Today, it’s much harder to find that don’t have some kind of negative impact on the planet.

manufacturers use complicated chemical and industrial processes to make clothing materials, from cotton to synthetic fibres. And while the environmental consequences aren’t always clear, consumption is growing. spent 14 per cent more on clothing and footwear in 2016 — around $350 billion total — than they did in 2011, and the trend is similar or greater in much of the rest of the world, according to the market research firm

Buying less is the easiest way to make a difference. But when you do need new clothes, you will usually be choosing among four major types of fibers: oil-based synthetics, cotton, rayon and wool. Their environmental trade-offs are so varied that a definitive ranking would be impossible. But here’s what we know, so you can make more informed decisions.

Synthetic fibers — polyester, nylon and others — make up more than 60 per cent of the global fiber market by some estimates. Most are made from oil, a nonrenewable resource.

Polyester, one of the most common fibers, is a plastic derived from crude oil. The long fibers that make up polyester thread are woven together to make fabric. Extracting the oil and melting the plastic require energy.

Perhaps a bigger concern is whathappens when synthetics get into the hands of consumers.

Synthetic fibres shed plastic filaments — possibly from daily wear and tear, but also in the wash. If shed in the laundry, the filaments can make it into sewer systems and eventually into waterways. Even if these microplastics are trapped at filtration plants, they can end up in sludge produced by the facilities, which is often sent to farms to be used as fertiliser. From there, the fibres can make their way into other water systems, or into the digestive tracts of animals that graze on the fertilised plants.

Cotton makes up about a quarter of all fibres used in clothing, furniture and other textiles. Synthetic fibres or rayon are often blended with cotton thread, especially if there is a cotton shortage, as there was in 2011, or if the price of cotton goes up.

Cotton also requires pesticides. According to the Department of Agriculture, 7 per cent of all pesticides in the United States are used on cotton. Many of those chemicals seep into the ground or run off into surface water. Consumers can choose organic cotton grown without pesticides, but it uses more water and requires more land than conventional crops. Organic cotton can also be much more expensive and difficult to find.

Rayon, one of the first man-made fibers, was developed from plant fibers as a substitute for silk in the 19th century. Most rayon today is produced as viscose rayon, which is treated with chemicals, including carbon disulfide.

Chronic exposure to carbon disulfide can cause serious health problems for rayon workers, including Parkinson’s disease, premature heart attack and stroke, said Paul Blanc, a professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, who has written about the history of rayon. The chemicals may also be released into the environment, though the effects are harder to pinpoint. By the time the rayon gets to the store, it poses no danger to consumers, Blanc said.

Viscose rayon is often made from bamboo. In Indonesia and other areas, producers are cutting down old-growth forests to plant bamboo for rayon, said Frances Kozen, associate director of the Cornell Institute of Fashion and Fiber Innovation.

If viscose rayon is produced mechanically from bamboo instead of chemically, which is sometimes known as “bamboo linen”, it has a relatively small environmental impact, but it is much more expensive.

Another type of rayon fibre, known as lyocell or Tencel, is often made from bamboo but uses a different chemical that is thought to be less toxic, though studies are scarce, Blanc said.

Producing wool requires sheep. And sheep, like other ruminants including cattle, produce methane, a powerful greenhouse gas, in their burps. One study suggested that 50 per cent of the greenhouse gas emissions from the wool industry come from the sheep themselves.

So what can you do? “The best thing we can all do is buy less and wear more,” Kozen said.


© 2017 The New York Times


Let's block ads! (Why?)

The kinder clothes

An ode to the art maker

Kiran Nadar Museum of Art’s Hangar for the Passerby is an exhibition about artist collectives — collaborative and participatory — in India. The main protagonist of the exhibition is the transient figure of the passerby. In practice, it is impossible to create a place for the passerby, a common face that is either the most documented figure or an eluding presence, and thus is a perfect to the collective or the mass. The exhibition makes visible the process of art making and opens a discourse on art and craft in modern India. The viewer moves between shafts, cavities, inclines, time warps, expeditions and wilderness, and encounters different groups of students and artists from different times and geographies. The exhibition is divided into six vortices, each with a distinct character. At the core is ‘The Souvenir Shop’, one of the most important vortices, which is populated with the ideas, objects, people and images of/from artist peers of Group 1890

On view at the Kiran Nadar Museum of Art, Noida, till November 18, 2017

Photos: Courtesy KNMA

An installation of photographs by Pablo Bartholomew

An installation of photographs by Pablo Bartholomew

Various objects come together to reveal the process of art making

Various objects come together to reveal the process of art making

A video installation featuring actor Rohini Hattangadi

A video installation featuring actor Rohini Hattangadi Photo: Sanjay K Sharma

The installation titled '10 Theses on the Archive', created in April 2010 in Beirut

The installation titled ‘10 Theses on the Archive’, created in April 2010 in Beirut

Paper masks highlight the multiplicity of faces in a crowd

Paper masks highlight the multiplicity of faces in a crowd  Photo: Sanjay K Sharma


Let's block ads! (Why?)

An ode to the art maker

Abhijeet Bhattacharya: The man who got his Twitter account suspended

Through most of May, appeared to have been on a well-documented trip spanning Hamburg, Prague, Rotterdam and Zurich, sharing with fans on Facebook pictures of him next to monuments and flashy cars. During this pleasurable European sojourn, he also found time to send tweets to some people in India that were disrespectful enough to get his account suspended by

Bhattacharya was seemingly upset by Jawaharlal Nehru University student-leader Shehla Rashid sharing articles, which had appeared in Hindustan Times and The Indian Express, about the involvement of some BJP men in a sex racket and a child trafficking case. Bhattacharya quoted her tweet and wrote, “There is rumour she took money in advance for 2 hrs and didn’t satisfy the client… big racket.” This insinuation was shared widely, with people making an appeal to report him to Unfazed, the continued tweeting angrily at those in support of Rashid.

The handle @abhijeetsinger now reads “account suspended”. has clear rules against abuse. “In order to ensure that people feel safe expressing diverse opinions and beliefs, we do not tolerate behaviour that crosses the line into abuse, including behaviour that harasses, intimidates, or uses fear to silence another user’s voice.” Bhattacharya did not respond to calls or messages seeking comment.

Yet, hours after this rap on the knuckles, a hashtag, #IStandWithAbhijeet, appeared and people tweeting with it said “nationalists” were being targeted unfairly. The blames writer “Arundhati Roy and JNU group”, whom he dubs “anti-Indian” for the action. Fellow artiste Sonu Nigam, too, quit in solidarity. But Bhattacharya is no first-time offender. That sympathetic hashtag surfaced in 2016 too, when he wrote hateful tweets to journalist Swati Chaturvedi. 

Chaturvedi had questioned his claim that the murder of young Infosys engineer S Swathi was connected to an unfounded practice called ‘love jihad’, in which Muslim men purportedly entice Hindu women in order to convert them. She suggested his facts were wrong and he was spreading misinformation driven by jealousy of more-successful Pakistani singers. From Bhattacharya’s response to this, the only printable part is “Besharam budhiya” (shameless hag). It ended with him being arrested by Mumbai Police and then let out on bail.


The wears his politics on his sleeve. An army of online supporters re-tweets his posts, which are characterised by rude language often aimed at women. He had over a million followers on Twitter, and two million people still follow him on Facebook. 

Some reckon his bitterness results from wanting to stay relevant despite a waning career. His Bollywood fame, which rose in the 1990s with cheerful songs such as “Badi Mushkil Hai” and “Main Koi Aisa Geet Gaoon”, had diminished in the 2000s. For a while, he was a judge on the reality show Indian Idol. He now records mainly for Bengali films, and performs in stage shows around the world.

Bhattacharya is not known to be struggling financially, though. He is said to have interests in real estate. He is also the organiser of one of the most prominent Durga Pujas at Lokhandwala in Mumbai. He and his wife have two sons. 

He has picked several fights in the fraternity before. He snubbed Aamir Khan for saying there was intolerance in India and was miffed with A R Rahman for making him wait. He also declared he would never sing for Shah Rukh Khan again, although it remains unclear if he was ever recently asked to.


Let's block ads! (Why?)

Abhijeet Bhattacharya: The man who got his Twitter account suspended

Enough of this mindless Baahubali mania

Since the last four weeks, the most read stories on this newspaper's website have been the myriad ones on the kind of money 2 has been minting at the box office. At a time when the country is in the grip of mob lynchings and a new tax system where renewables (18%) are taxed more than coal (5%) and sanitary napkins are taxed at 12% while sindoor is tax free, it's fascinating that people are obsessed with following the box office conquests of a frankly unspectacular movie.

As someone who hails from coastal Andhra, my heart swells that finally Telugu cinema is being recognised in the Hindi-speaking parts of the country without being subsumed under that hideous rubric called “Madrasi cinema”. But I wish the industry was recognised for something more compelling than a generic, lethargic movie that rightly is, to quote a website's headline, “three hours of porn”. But is not exactly Telugu cinema. The characters could have come from anywhere from Indian mythology. Comparisons with quintessential Telugu gems like Maya Bazaar, Daana Veera Soora Karna are uncalled for.

Director is a one-trick pony but that trick might just rock your 180-minute existence at the cinema, if you are in an easy-to-please mood, that is. Right from his debut 16 years ago, Student No.1, Rajamouli has been the master of interval bangs.

Each movie of his moves along sedately in the first half, until things hit a deafening crescendo in the pre-interval sequence only to put its eager audience back into a lull. I still get gooseflesh when my inadvertent nocturnal YouTubing activity involves me gaping at the intermission parts of Simhadri, Vikramarkudu, Magadheera or Chhatrapati.


The movies don't even stand up to Rajamouli's underwhelming standards. However, the franchise ought to be a case study at Ivy League B-schools. In 1960s, a clever person posted an ad in New York Times asking for a dollar from the public for a secret that he would reveal days later. He got truckloads of dollars only to reveal that there was no secret in the first place and to prove public can be conned when marketing strategy is spot on. Rajamouli did something similar with his “Why Kattappa Killed ” question.

It was the biggest moment in the sclerotic Indian pop culture history after Shah Rukh Khan's “lungi dance”. Alas, the answer to that all-important question had coitus interruptus written all over it. Not a single person I know was blown away by the revelation but then, you pay for your ticket upfront.


It's a minor tragedy that while mainstream English media was salivating copiously from the corners of its mouth over 2 and its collections, not even a footnote was reserved for K Vishwanath, who got the Dadasaheb Phalke award earlier this month. Here's a man who made the country's most progressive cinema like Shankarabharanam, Swati Mutyam, Saagara Sangamam, Saptapadi, Sirivennela, to name a few of his outstanding works. Barring Telugu media, where his works have been discussed threadbare to a beautiful effect, the English media has been near silent. Ignorance isn't always bliss when media is basically co-opting in making the audience choose junk food over fresh fruits and leafy vegetables. This is basically capitalism at its despicable best.

In a deftly argued New Statesman piece titled “In Defence of Philistinism”, Yo Zushi says that canons are formed by critical consensus and that none of the five most profitable films – Avatar, Titanic, Star Wars: the Force Awakens, Jurassic World and The Avengers – are by any means canonical. You've probably seen them, but don't feel guilty, says the writer. “They are, to be frank, dumb and devoid complexity yet millions of people love them,” Yo writes. Unlike West, here we seem to forget that “event movies” are not cinema and that they cater to the basest human instincts, like Fast and Furious et al. The whole hype surrounding Rajamouli's magnum crapus reminded me of a line from Robert Musil's The Man Without Qualities, which I am poring over at the moment: “Much of a man's importance lies in his ability to make himself understood by his contemporaries.”

I hope against hope that Indian film-makers don't take their future cue from the creator of this insufferable franchise.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Enough of this mindless Baahubali mania

jeudi 25 mai 2017

The rise of the random 'superfan'

Superfandom 

How Our Obsessions are Changing What We Buy and Who We Are

Aaron M Glazer and Zoe Fraade-Blanar

Hachette

318 pages; Rs 499

In April, Carter Wilkerson, a teenager from Nevada, tweeted to Wendy’s, an American fast food chain: “Yo@Wendys how many retweets for a year of free chicken nuggets?” Mr Wilkerson’s tweet was probably in jest, but Wendy’s chose to humour him nonetheless: “18 million.”

Mr Wilkerson’s subsequent tweet, in which he asks Tweeples (short for “Twitter people”) around the globe to help him reach his goal, was retweeted more than 3.4 million times, the highest ever, beating the earlier record held by Ellen DeGeneres’ selfie Tweet from Oscars 2014.

Marketers would crown Mr Wilkerson’s tweet the ne plus ultra of branding efforts — unplanned, organic customer feedback that got many people to try Wendy’s chicken nuggets for the first time, and pushed the company’s name high on brand recall globally. 

Zoe Fraade-Blanar and Aaron M Glazer, authors of the book under review, would call Mr Wilkerson a “superfan”, a member of an enviable club that only some brands are lucky enough to possess, and, if they are smart, nurture. Driven by social media, the “superfan” is young, connected and, most importantly, given to sharing bouquets and brickbats with equal fervour. 

Millennials are often portrayed in disparaging terms in the media as a coddled lot that do not appreciate that they are, materially and security-wise, the luckiest generation there has been. In Superfandom, Ms Fraade-Blanar and Mr Glazer dismiss such simplistic generalisations, offering a wide variety of examples that showcase how the medium may have changed but the message remains the same.


Consider Harry Potter. J K Rowling’s creation has transformed from the page into a multi-billion dollar empire with interests in film, merchandise and even theme parks. Or (GoT), a television spectacle that has fans hungering for new seasons (or, if they are lucky, spinoffs). To true-blue fans, standing outside a bookshop on the night before a new Potter release or bingeing on a GoT season is an essential rite of passage that they would not give up for anything in the world.

Beyond this, “superfans” can bring about real change in company bottom-lines. Case in point: The death of traditional photography. With the rise of digital prints, many storied companies like Kodak and Polaroid have gone under. But in Polaroid’s case, the company – or at least its idea – saw a revival due to the commitment of two of its “superfans” to instant photography. 

When the company decided to cease all production of instant film in 2008, Austrian photographer Florian Kaps got in touch with André Bosman, a former head of film production at the Polaroid factory at Enschede in the Netherlands. Together, they launched the Impossible Project, the, well, impossible plan to relaunch Polaroid with the help of similarly hurting fans.

It worked. The Enschede plant was leased to the company floated by Mr Kaps, who raised $2.6 million from friends and family towards his goal. But that’s just the financials. Ms Fraade-Blanar and Mr Glazer narrate the story of one Erik Smith whose experiences with Polaroid defined some of the most cherished moments of his life. Given a chance to become an Impossible Project pioneer, he jumped at it.

With support from such fans, the Impossible Project has since launched a series of modern Polaroid cameras that are popular with preteens who associate it with retro cool. As anyone bingeing Netflix’s latest hit 13 Reasons Why will tell you, teenagers love nothing more than novelty, and for a generation of digital natives, Polaroid is as novel as it gets.

To be sure, “superfan” enthusiasm can backfire as quickly as it is ignited if the feeling that a cherished ideal has been besmirched goes around. The pushback can be fierce, as Pepsi and Kendall Jenner discovered in April when an advertisement showcased the actor resolve a charged conflict over a bottle of Pepsi. Critics called Mr Jenner’s portrayal of an intermediary between the police and Black Lives Matter protestors “trivialising”. While the ad may have been well-intentioned, it also smacked of tone deafness.

To Ms Fraade-Blanar and Mr Glazer, such reactions are not just common but only to be expected from a demographic that takes its tastes and passions very seriously. Fandom then is not just about commerce; it is a deeply social phenomenon where members try on different clubs for size until they figure out what speaks to them most intimately.


works best as a chronicle of such great stories that, by their very nature, resist prescription. The trick, as the Wendy’s story reminds us, is spontaneity — and also, frankly, serendipity. Planned events rarely create that sort of online buzz. 

The book should find its way into marketing courses to help prospective MBAs appreciate the fickle world of social media marketing. Meanwhile, marketing mavens, who must justify every dollar spent on embellishing their product, will, on this book’s evidence, just have to wait for Lady Luck to shine on them.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

The rise of the random 'superfan'