jeudi 31 août 2017

Mahapurush to PK: Self-styled gurus are often ridiculed on the silver screen

Last Friday, three states — Punjab, Haryana and Delhi — were held to ransom by self-styled godman Singh Insaan’s disciples, who demanded their guru be not convicted in a rape case by a special Central Bureau of Investigation court. The orgy of violence unleashed by them in different parts of Haryana and the salacious details of Singh’s have been described in great detail by the media, so I shall abstain. With courts on Monday sentencing him to 20 years in prison, justice seems to have finally caught up with Singh, who also starred in — and also directed, wrote, edited and gave music to — two blatant propaganda films, MSG: The Messenger and 2: The Messenger.

Religion has played a significant part in Indian cinema, starting from the very first full-length feature, Raja Harishchandra (1913) to Aamir Khan-starrer (2015). One might argue that popular Hindi cinema, too, has had a significant influence on religion: Take the example of Jai Santoshi Ma. The low-budget mythological, devotional film was one of the biggest hits of 1975 — the same year Sholay was released. It also provided fuel to the cult of the “new”, relatively unknown goddess, which has now become a pan-India phenomenon. But self-styled godmen, of whom we have never had any paucity in this country, have fared not too well on the silver screen.

The opening scene of Satyajit Ray’s Mahapurush — adapted from Parashuram’s (Rajshekhar Basu’s pen name) Birinchi-Baba — might be uncannily familiar to any audience today. As the Birinchi Baba of the title distributes prasad to his devotees, gathered to see him off at a station, he holds to hostage the departure of the train he is on. Even the station master is his devotee, and waits till his signal — and a piece of prasad — before showing the green flag to the waiting train. The scene is similar to the images of police officers saluting Gurmeet Singh before arresting him, or even worse, Sri Sri Ravi Shankar’s Art of Living hosting a festival on the Yamuna flood plains in Delhi and destroying it in brazen disregard of authorities and with obvious political patronage. Prime Minister Narendra Modi was a guest at the event.


The Baba in Ray’s film — played by the grossly underrated Charuprakash Ghosh — has no problem in finding new victims, either. In the train itself, he meets advocate Gurupada Mitter, who has been deeply depressed since the death of his wife. The Baba and his unnamed assistant (Rabi Ghosh in yet another brilliant cameo), set up base in Mitter’s house, and start delivering evening sermons, where he claims to have engaged Shankaracharya, Christ and Plato in philosophical discussions, eaten hippopotamus roasts, and taught Albert Einstein all about the Theory of Relativity. But, his pincer grip on the hapless family brings him to conflict with Mitter’s younger daughter Nilima’s (Geetali Roy) paramour Satya (Satindra Bhattacharya) and his friends.

With great economy, Ray’s opening shot of the scene in which we meet Nibaran, Paramartha and Nitai — the gang that eventually unmasks Birinchi Baba — shows a chess board. It is Sunday morning (the Sunday Statesman is on the centre table) and Nibaran, a professor of philosophy, and Paramartha, an insurance agent, are playing a game of chess. Both chess and The Statesman would figure in Ray’s later films — Shatranj ke Khiladi (1977) and Aranyer Din Ratri (1969) as different metaphors — but here both represent reason; “intellectual pursuits”, as a miffed Paramartha reminds Nitai and Satya. Games figure significantly in Ray’s films — the memory game in Aranyer Din Ratri; the tongue twisters in Sakha Proshaka, 1990. In another scene, Paramartha is seen playing a game of patience alone.

Their games, however, are harmless, unlike the games and lies of Birinchi Baba, aimed at fooling and cheating the naive. One of his many performances is moving his right and left forefingers in opposite directions, denoting the movement of time into past and future. After a few attempts, Nibaran, too, masters it — and the audience is made aware that the Baba’s tenure at the Mitter household is limited. Ray would continue his attack on such false gurus in his two Feluda films — Sonar Kella (1974) and Joy Baba Felunath (1979). In the latter, Machchli Baba, who gives his devotees fish scales with his blessings, turns out to be an associate of the arch-villain and smuggler Maganlal Meghraj (Utpal Dutt). The villains in Sonal Kella — Amiyanath Burman and Mandar Bose — had set up a practice like Franz Mesmer (or Birinchi Baba and his assistant) before being busted by parapsychologist Dr Hemanga Hajra.


For Ray, perhaps the last Bengali Renaissance man, were — like his film —black and white. A more colourful representation is in Dev Anand-starrer Guide, which was also his production house Navketan’s first colour venture. It was on Pearl S Buck’s suggestion that Anand read R K Narayan’s eponymous novel and convinced the writer to sell him the right. (Narayan was not too happy with the adaptation; in The Misguded Guide, he wrote, in characteristic humour, that the superstar had promised him the sky but by the time the film was released the sky had come so low that one could poke it with one’s umbrella.) Anand’s character, Raju, is not a swami, till denizens of a village he has wandered into mistakenly take him to be one. The title of the film is, of course, a double entendre — Raju is actually a guide in real life, but also turns into a spiritual guide. His 12-day fast to make it rain in the drought-afflicted village is ritual self-purification. The ending of the book is more ambiguous: it’s unclear if Raju’s fast leads to the rain or if it happens naturally.

Both Guide and Mahapurush were, incidentally, released in 1965. To my mind, they were responses, albeit of very different kinds, to the phenomenon of hippies flooding into the country, escaping conscription for the Vietnam War, and in search of easily available drugs and religiosity. The hippies were following the trail of American Beat poet Allen Ginsberg, who had spent nearly two years in the country, in the early sixties; by the end of the decade, the Beatles would set up camp in the ashram of Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, another self-styled religious guru.

The ridiculous extent to which these orientalist fantasies were stretched have been well documented by Geeta Mehta in Karma Cola: “The kings of rock and roll abdicated. To Ravi Shankar and the Maharishi... Mao had lost out to Maya. The revolution was dead... So we tagged along with the Americans one more time. Not because of right thought, right speech, right action. But because of the rhythm section. ...Everyone suspected that whatever America wanted, America got. Why not Nirvana?” This Nirvana Rush was brilliantly depicted — glamorised and lampooned at the same time — in Dev Anand’s Hare Rama Hare Krishna (1971).

But it was not all sex, drugs and rock and roll with the religious gurus and their organisations. In 1975, former Union minister L N Mishra was killed in a bomb explosion at the Samastipur station; three members of West Bengal-based Anand Marga were accused in the case. (They were finally convicted in 2014.) The group has also been implicated in the Purulia arms drop case and in the Sydney Hilton bombing of 1978. In 1984, a senior member of “sex guru” Rajneesh’s cult was accused and convicted in a food poisoning conspiracy in The Dalles, Oregon, the US. While Rajneesh (later popular as Osho) was never convicted, the popularity of his cult in the US took a major hit after this.

In India, the most popular religious leader was perhaps Sathya Sai Baba, whose brand value managed to survive almost every attack: “from charges of homosexuality, a cover-up of murders in the ashram, exposes of his magic tricks, not to speak of the fabulous wealth controlled by his trust”, writes Sheela Reddy (“God On A Phone Line”, Outlook, 9 May 2011). How his magic tricks were exposed is recalled by Vir Sanghvi: “the magician P C Sorcar Jr was refused entry into Sai Baba’s presence. He went under a false name and when the Baba miraculously produced a sandesh, Sorcar returned the compliment by miraculously producing a rasgulla. The Baba began shouting and Sorcar was physically evicted from the ashram.” (“Truth about Sathya Sai Baba”, Hindustan Times, 26 November 2006)

Godmen-busting magicians and rationalists were the inspiration for Goga, Amitabh Bachchan’s character in Prakash Mehra’s Jaadugar (1989). The spark of Bachchan-Mehra collaborations — Zanjeer (1972), Muqaddar ka Sikandar (1978), Laawaris (1981), Namak Halaal (1982) and Sharaabi (1984) — is missing from this one, their last film together. It’s patchy at best and did not do too well at the box office. The only striking thing about it is Goga, a drunkard and skirt-chaser, who has enough cunning to unmask and dethrone Amrish Puri’s trick-performing Mahaguru. This is not a film I would recommend. However, with one Baba in jail, and a few others facing rape charges, one would not mind a maverick magician vanishing these “miracle workers”.


Let's block ads! (Why?)

Mahapurush to PK: Self-styled gurus are often ridiculed on the silver screen

mercredi 30 août 2017

Your pace of walking may predict heart disease, mortality risk: Study

Are you a middle-aged person with a slow walking pace? If yes, you might be at a higher risk of developing heart disease compared to those who steady or at a brisk pace, researchers have found.

The study revealed that middle-aged people, both men and women, who reported that they are slow walkers were around twice as likely to have a heart-related death compared to brisk walkers.

"This suggests that habitual walking pace is an independent predictor of heart-related death," said Professor Tom Yates, Reader at the

Further, walking pace was strongly linked to an individual's objectively measured tolerance and a good measure of overall

"Thus, walking pace could be used to identify individuals who have low and high that would benefit from targeted physical interventions," Yates added.

Moreover, the study also found that handgrip strength is a weak predictor of heart-related deaths in men and could not be generalised across the population as a whole.

For the study, published in the European Heart Journal, the team analysed 420,727 middle-aged people across Britain.

In the following 6.3 years, after the data was collected there were 8,598 deaths: 1,654 died from cardiovascular disease, while cancer took 4,850 lives. 

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Your pace of walking may predict heart disease, mortality risk: Study

mardi 29 août 2017

How not to communicate: Lessons from trolls

In recent weeks, many Americans have been astounded by the hatred some of their compatriots seem to harbour towards people of colour, immigrants and anyone else who seems different. But as a woman who is regularly trolled for sharing her opinions, I have long understood that our country has a harrowing problem with hate.


I’m a professor and I write about one op-ed a week, typically for CNN Opinion and Bloomberg View. My commentary focuses on politics and communication, so I’ve written about everything from how President Donald can communicate more effectively to why Cynthia Nixon should run for governor of The abusive emails and tweets I receive in response aren’t voluminous — they clearly come from a small fringe of my readers. But three things about them trouble me, and suggest trouble for the country.

First is the issue of gender. Although it’s difficult to confirm someone’s identity on the basis of an email alone, it appears that almost all of my hate mail comes from men. For example, more than 90 per cent of these messages come from senders with traditionally male names. They often contain other cues that lead me to suppose the writers are men. For example, one Lee W signed his vitriolic missive with “husband, father and grandfather”.


And the language they use is rife with sexist slurs. As an example, when I criticised in a CNN op-ed for commenting on the French first lady’s body, a Henry O in Cleveland wrote, “I’m sick of women or their pansy men who get offended over comments or jokes that they judge to be ‘offensive’. Screw you, bitch.”

My experience is hardly unique: Research confirms that female writers get more cruel feedback than men. When The Guardian commissioned a study of the comments posted by their readers last year, its conclusion was clear: “Articles written by women attract more abuse and dismissive trolling than those written by men, regardless of what the article is about.” Eight of the 10 writers who received the most abuse were women, even though the majority of the paper’s regular opinion writers were men. (This same pattern repeats with race: Although most of the male Guardian writers were white, the two men who received the most abuse were black.) And while women are disproportionately targeted by trolls, men are more likely to be trolls, researchers have found.


The second thing that troubles me is that hate mail usually doesn’t contain counterarguments. Writers almost never try to explain why they believe I’m wrong; instead, they attack me personally. (I sometimes need to reference Urban Dictionary to understand the earthy phrases they use.) For example, after I wrote commentary for CNN arguing that Fox News should have fired host Bill O’Reilly when allegations of against him were first raised, a Greg V emailed, “I bet... you would be praying to have a famous rich guy call you hot anything.”

© Bloomberg

Let's block ads! (Why?)

How not to communicate: Lessons from trolls

Maria Sharapova scores thumping win on Grand Slam return after 15-month ban

Former world number one Maria made a triumphant return to competition after a 15-month doping ban, outlasting second-ranked 6-4, 4-6, 6-3 at the

The 30-year-old Russian, who had only one hardcourt tune-up match due to a nagging forearm injury, swatted 60 winners with 64 unforced errors, setting the tempo and baffling Halep at times in a tension-packed thriller at Arthur Ashe Stadium.


"I just thought this was another day, another opportunity, another match but this was so much more," said.

"You sometimes wonder why you put in all the work and this is exactly why."

Five-time champion closed her remarks to a supportive crowd by saying that behind her fancy dress and sparkly crystals, "This girl has a lot of grit and she's not going anywhere."

Sharapova, who tested positive for the banned blood booster meldonium at last year's Australian Open, improved to 7-0 in her all-time rivalry with Halep, extending her mastery over the 25-year-old Romanian.

An emotional punctuated her shotmaking, at times erratic and other moments spectacular, with screams and fist pumps. She was energetic even at rest, closing her eyes and bouncing her legs as she sat between sets.

After the final point, dropped to her knees as a replay appeal showed what she already knew.

She rose and greeted Halep at the net, thanked the umpire, then battled back tears as she blew kisses to spectators, sobbed at times and mouthed "Thank you" to fans that were devoted throughout the two hour and 45 minute drama.

"You never know what you're going to feel until you win that match point," she said. "It was so worth it."

won only 5 of 22 break points in the match while Halep won 4 of 10 and produced only 15 winners against 14 unforced errors.

It was Sharapova's first match since a quarter-final loss to Serena Williams in last year's Australian Open.

Sharapova, whose major titles include the 2006 US Open, advanced to a second-round matchup against Hungarian Timea Babos, whom she has never played.

Sharapova, ranked 146th, returned in April but the French Open snubbed for a wildcard entry and she missed Wimbledon with a thigh injury.

Asked about her low points, Sharapova, said, "There were definitely a few but I don't think this is the time to talk about that."

walked onto the court at Arthur Ashe Stadium to rousing applause from a clearly supportive crowd.

wore a black dress, visor, socks and shoes, the same style she sported in taking the trophy nine years ago on the New York hardcourts.

Two early exchanges of breaks left the first set level at 4-4 before held and broke Halep with a forehand winner to draw first blood after an hour.

In the second set, double faulted away a break to hand Halep a 5-4 edge, then Halep saved three break points and held to force a third set.

Halep sent a backhand beyond the baseline to hand a break and 2-0 lead in the final set. The Russian held to 5-3 and served for the match, escaping a break point when Halep netted a forehand.

A backhand winner to set up match point bought huge applause but the truly thunderous ovation came when Halep hit a forehand long to end it, boosting to 18-0 in night matches at Ashe.

"It's prime time baby," she said. "I love it."

Reigning Wimbledon champion Muguruza advanced and British seventh seed Johanna Konta was ousted in other women's matches.

Spanish third seed Muguruza defeated American Varvara Lepchenko 6-0, 6-3. Muguruza, last year's French Open champion, can reach the third round for the first time Wednesday by defeating China's Duan Ying-Ying.

"Coming to and having a dark past in the results, I keep it with low expectations," Muguruza said.

Serbia's 78th-ranked Aleksandra Krunic upset Australian- born Konta 4-6, 6-3, 6-4.

"It's definitely not an easy loss to take," Konta said. "She played consistently much better than I did."

Croatian fifth seed Marin Cilic, the 2014 champion and last month's Wimbledon runner-up, ousted 105th- ranked American Tennys Sandgren 6-4, 6-3, 3-6, 6-3.

"I feel just a little bit rusty," Cilic said. "I need a few matches to get into the rhythm."

Seven-time champion Venus Williams, this year's Australian Open and Wimbledon runner-up, outlasted Slovakia's 135th-ranked Viktoria Kuzmova 6-3 3-6 6-2.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Maria Sharapova scores thumping win on Grand Slam return after 15-month ban

lundi 28 août 2017

Millennials can't trust robots; corruption is their biggest worry: Survey

of India and other nations cannot trust as yet to take decisions on their behalf and the most pressing national issues for them include and inequality, a worldwide survey showed on Monday.

Besides, climate change is keeping them up at night as their biggest global concern for the third year in a row, showed the survey conducted by Geneva-based WEF (World Economic Forum).


More than 31,000 millennials, aged 18-35, from over 180 countries, including India, participated in the on technology, economy, values, career and governance, the WEF said in a statement.

It also said that over 78 per cent young people would welcome refugees in their own neighbourhood.


"Corruption, inequality and lack of career and economic opportunities are seen as the most pressing national issues by around the globe," it stated.

Among other results, 74 per cent observed that technology is creating more jobs than it is destroying, but a majority of 51 per cent respondents disagreed or strongly disagreed when asked if they would trust decisions made by a robot on their behalf.

Showing that young people's enthusiasm for technology has limits, 44 per cent rejected the idea of having an implant in their skin to increase their capabilities.

Asked about whether they would support rights for humanoid robots, the most popular response was 'No' (50 per cent). The 'Yes' answer choice had only 14 per cent while 36 per cent chose 'Maybe'.

The US emerged as the top destination of young people looking to advance their career, followed by Canada, the UK, Germany, Australia, Switzerland, France, Spain, Sweden and the Netherlands.

A large majority of young people said they are willing to live outside their country of residence in order to find a job or advance their career (81 per cent). For the third year in a row, the United States remained on the top, found the survey, which was conducted between March 31 and June 30 this year.

On the most serious issues affecting the world, the maximum respondents said it was climate change, followed by large-scale conflict or war.

Also, a big majority said they "strongly agree" that humans are responsible for climate change, which has remained the top global issue for the third year on the trot.


More than half of the believe that young people's views are ignored before important decisions are taken in their country.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Millennials can't trust robots; corruption is their biggest worry: Survey

dimanche 27 août 2017

Hope for the humanities

The Surprising Power of a “Useless” Liberal Arts Education  

Little, Brown & Company

342 pages; $27

Why Liberal Arts Majors Make Great Employees   

Redwood Press

291 pages; $25


Surely one day the ability to interface directly with the nanomachinery connected to our brains will render computer science as we know it obsolete. When experts start arguing for its continued relevance, undergraduates choosing a major will begin to realise that the obscure art of manually punching arcane symbols into keyboards is no longer a safe bet. At the present moment, however, it is only liberal arts majors who have to wonder whether all of the articles and promoting the marketability of their chosen discipline should make them more or less uneasy about the future. Two additions to this growing field have appeared just in time to try to soothe the post-graduation panic that some within the class of 2017 may be experiencing.

According to both and Randall Stross, the ever-expanding tech sector is now producing career opportunities in fields — project management, recruitment, human relations, branding, data analysis, market research, design, fund-raising and sourcing, to name some — that specifically require the skills taught in the humanities. To thrive in these areas, one must be able to communicate effectively, read subtle social and emotional cues, make persuasive arguments, adapt quickly to fluid environments, interpret new forms of information while translating them into a compelling narrative and anticipate obstacles and opportunities before they arise. Programmes like English or history represent better preparation, the two authors argue, for the demands of the newly emerging “rapport sector” than vocationally oriented disciplines like engineering or finance. Though it does not automatically land one in a particular career, training in the humanities, when pitched correctly, will ultimately lead to gainful and fulfilling employment. Indeed, by the time they reach what Stross terms the “peak earning ages,” 56-60, liberal arts majors earn on average $2,000 more per year than those with pre-professional degrees (if advanced degrees in both categories are included).

While both supply useful talking points in support of the financial viability of studying the liberal arts, they may arouse more fear than hope. Both feature myriad anecdotes of job searches, all with happy endings, but the journey there invariably proves daunting, circuitous and chancy. Moreover, the reality that apparently favours liberal arts majors is precisely what makes the current job market so forbidding: Extreme precariousness. Trained to be flexible and adaptable, these students are well equipped, according to Anders, to navigate an unstable job market, where companies, fields and sometimes whole industries rise and fall at a nauseating clip, where automation is rendering once coveted skills redundant and where provisional short-term jobs, freelance assignments, part-time gigs, unpaid internships and self-employment are replacing long-term, full-time salaried positions that include rights and benefits protected by unions. While Anders, a contributing writer at Forbes magazine, clearly wants the best for recent liberal arts graduates, his pep talk often consists of rebranding the treacherous market conditions of the 21st century as part of a thrilling new frontier. But somehow it seems unlikely that his analogy to white-water rafting will get them excited to send out yet another batch of cover letters and résumés.

The two also raise hard questions about who exactly can turn a liberal arts degree into a successful career. In almost all of the stories, job candidates must survive a significant lag time before finding a position that pays the bills, during which they are often forced to pursue additional training or accept poorly compensated work while relying on financial support from their parents. Moreover, in just about every case, they end up tapping into an extensive network of family and friends. Ominously, Stross, a professor of business at San Jose State University, chooses to restrict his study to Stanford graduates in order to ensure that he has a sufficient number of success stories. And even these individuals end up struggling along the way. How much harder must it be for those with fewer connections and with BAs from less prestigious schools? No wonder first-generation, working-class and foreign students are so often drawn to technology and business majors, which appear to provide a more direct line between credentials earned and career opportunities secured. 

 Advocates of the liberal arts will maintain that the intellectual experiences fostered in these disciplines ought to be available to everyone. If the trust-fund kids don’t have to weigh the practicality of studying feminist philosophy when registering for classes, why should the scholarship students? Moreover, many academics dismiss the now widespread tendency to assess fields of study in terms of their marketability, viewing it as a sign of the American university’s capitulation to a corporatist, neoliberal ideology. The goal of the liberal arts, they would say, is to impart knowledge, promote the capacity for serious intellectual inquiry and encourage critical perspectives on prevailing norms and assumptions, whether or not such training attracts prospective employers. But then what professors don’t want their students to get good jobs after college, particularly those saddled with debts accrued to pay their tuition? Thus true believers in liberal arts degrees may find themselves rejecting the criteria that Anders and Stross use to assert their value and viability while secretly, desperately hoping that the two authors’ prognosis is correct.
 

©2017 The New York Times News Service


Let's block ads! (Why?)

Hope for the humanities

Hacked Real Madrid Twitter account announces Messi signing

The official account of was hacked by OurMine to announce the signing of the capital football club's eternal rival FC Barcelona's star Lionel Messi, according to reports.

The post, which was accompanied by a video of scoring for Barcelona against Real Madrid, was put up on Real's account and said: "Benvingut Messi! B!Bienvenido Messi! Welcome Messi! Bienvenue Messi! £Messi," as reported by the Independent on Saturday.

The signing post had more than 2,800 likes and 3,100 retweets. The tweet remained public for around 90 minutes before they disappeared from the club's Spanish and English language feeds.

The incident occured after the same group of hackers took charge of Barcelona's account and announced the signing of Paris Saint-Germain winger Angel Di Maria.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Hacked Real Madrid Twitter account announces Messi signing

samedi 26 août 2017

'Qaidi Band' review: Finest Yash Raj film since 'Dum Lagake Haisha'

In 'Qaidi Band' there is a hotshot lawyer played by Ram Kapoor, who agrees to help innocent undertrials free of cost. Such miracles don't happen in real life. But when they do in this film we sigh in relief.

In Faisal's fast-flowing anthem to imprisoned angst Sanju (played with bridled vigour by debutant Aadar Jain) tells Bindu (Anya Singh, a prized find) about how he got trapped into prison life. This happens in a judiciously crafted scene where Sanju attends to Bindu's injured foot while narrating his tale in rapid fire loop. Yes, Sanju talks a lot. He has lot of pain to hide and he hides it well.

His healing touch is indeed balm to Bindu's 'sole'.

In 'Qaidi Band' I found many such moments of deep connectivity creeping up on me from the corners of the austerely articulated frames that send out silent screams against the cult of injustice which we have embraced much in the same way that thousands accept rapists as godmen.

The film hits out at the establishment. It hits out real hard. From the start writer-director (Faisal) means business. He wastes no time in preliminaries as the undertrials are introduced to us without fuss or flourish. It's astonishing how much the two principal debutants blend into the ferociously raw fabric of the storytelling. Both Aadar Jain and Anya Singh are exemplary in their ability to comprehend the sheer desperation of their characters' predicament.

The narrative is huddled and strong. It raises pertinent questions on the issue of freedom and then lapses into a kind of loopy climactic triumph that is purely Utopian.

The young fresh-faced actors convey the anguish of the endless wait for freedom with conviction. Aadar Jain is the clown of the pack, conveying a strong sense of righteousness even when wronged. Aadar reminded me of his grandfather Raj Kapoor. His eyes speak volumes. And Amit Trivedi's music does the rest.

Anya's character Bindu remains optimistic till the moment the judge announces her bail at Rs 5 lakhs. Her meltdown in the courtroom when the honourable (and frankly weary) judge suggests Vipaasana will convince even the most diehard cynic that Anya is a talent to reckon with.

The other newcomers playing desperate prisoners are also exemplary, specially Mikhail Yawalkar as the poet and family man who waits every month for his wife and daughter's visit and is crushed like the birthday cake that the wife brings for him, when his daughter refuses to visit.

High praise must also be showered on cinematographer Anay Goswami for bringing to the rust-coloured frames a feeling of arid anxiety. And Trivedi's music aided by anguished angry barbed lyrics goes a long way into giving this remarkable film a slug at sustained excellence.

Yes, the climax is unrealistic and Sachin Pilgaonkar as the morally compromised jailor is too much Santa and too little Gabbar. But the flaws don't take away from this film's long-legged statement on freedom and how much we take it for granted.

Faisal's film avoids the preachy route. It's neither a vehicle to launch new talent nor a propaganda piece. Its efficacy is lodged in its sincerity of purpose and an absolute disregard for formulaic tropes and cliches. 'Qaidi Band' is the finest film since 'Dum Lagake Haisha'.

Film: "Qaidi Band"; Director: Habib Faisal; Cast: Aadar Jain, Anya Singh

Let's block ads! (Why?)

'Qaidi Band' review: Finest Yash Raj film since 'Dum Lagake Haisha'

vendredi 25 août 2017

A design project that is giving Arundhati Roy's book a voice and a vision

Sootirahubaua, bhakolabaiya

Naanigaam se angaa, siyaatabaiya


Nativity, one of the chapters in Arundhati Roy’s new book, The Ministry of Utmost Happiness, features this beautiful While reading the book, I would often ascribe a voice and tune to it, wondering what it would feel like to hear it sung. And now, courtesy the Re:Reader created by Itu Chaudhuri Designs, or ICD, one can hear Sootirahu and also experience the book in ways one could not have imagined before. There are elegant animations that showcase the text in a new light, excerpts from the 12 chapters, often set to haunting scores, and portions read by Roy herself. It’s a dreamy, artistic and powerful companion to the book — full of surprises with every click — perfect to curl up with on a balmy afternoon.

Lisa Rath, the creative director on the project, who worked with a team of animators and coders, calls the Re:Reader, “the toy”. Roy terms it as “utmost perennial”. “It’s a new, fun way of introducing a book to people who haven’t read it. And another way of enjoying it for people who have. And it’ll be out there — everywhere — without an expiry date,” she has said about it. 


It all started when Rath met Roy, through a common friend and got into a discussion about what could be done around that would go beyond the book. A film had already been made for her to play at events and readings abroad, so ICD’s approach needed to be different. “I work on the web space a lot. It makes everything immortal,” says Rath.

This trail of thoughts led her from one question to another, one of the critical ones being: can the web, which is a space where you impart and consume information at fleeting speeds, allow you to keep aside the impatience that comes with browsing, slow down and savour a text? Once she realised that this was a possibility, Rath set down to work on the format of Re:Reader. “It was a conscious decision to keep it typographic and not use images, so that the ‘reading’ experience remained pure,” she says. Once Roy liked the idea, Rath started extracting portions from the chapters, which evoked the essence of the book but didn't give the story away. 
The Ministry of Utmost Happiness
plays a pivotal role in bringing the experience alive. Rath, who decided to use sounds in a non-intrusive manner, says: “One had to think of how would a reader from react to the music, and also how would a reader sitting in Ireland relate to it. The was recorded in our studio. We realised we had a wonderful talent amidst us, so we got her to sing. A friend sent the same piece sung by his mother, so we recorded again to get the accent right.” These melodies and small, humour-packed animations gave the Re:Reader a life of its own. 

Though mapped in a linear fashion to ease navigation, the Re:Reader allows the user to engage with it on separate visits, start with Dr Azad Bhartiya (chapter 4) and move backwards to Khwabgah (chapter 2). The reader, thus, weaves his own story, making his own connections and personalising his experience of the book.

Re:Reader is available free of cost on http://ift.tt/2xzMPuO

Let's block ads! (Why?)

A design project that is giving Arundhati Roy's book a voice and a vision

Age like a former athlete

Being a world-class distance in your youth does not guarantee that you will be fit and healthy in retirement. But it helps, according to a new study that followed a group of elite American runners for 45 years.

The study’s findings raise interesting questions about how we can and should age and the role that youthful activity might play in our health later in life.

Aging is one of the great mysteries of life and science. Its chronology is clear: With each passing year, we are a year older. But the biology of the process is murky. Scientists remain uncertain about how and why our bodies change as we age and to what extent such changes are inevitable or mutable.


In other words, we do not know whether aging as most of us now experience it is normal for the human species or not.


That issue is at the heart of the new study, which was published this month in Medicine & Science in & Exercise. It began almost 50 years ago, with a spate of coaching and testing that took place just before the 1968 Summer Olympic track and field trials in the United States. At that time, Jack Daniels, an exercise physiologist and running coach, began working with some of America’s top distance running prospects. He tested 26 of the extensively, determining their aerobic capacity, or VO2 max, and many other measures of health and performance capability.

All of the runners, who were in their early to mid-20s, were in exceptional shape, with aerobic capacities at or above the 98th percentile for men of their age. Several won medals at the 1968 Summer Games.

Twenty-five years later, in 1993, curious to see how the athletes’ bodies had changed in the intervening years, Daniels, a professor of kinesiology at A.T. Still University in Mesa, Ariz., assembled the same group at a human performance lab and tested them again. Then in 2012, he mentioned this trove of unpublished data to his colleague Sarah Everman, an assistant professor of kinesiology at the university.


Intrigued, Everman suggested that they bring the back to the lab again. Twenty-two of the men, who by this time were in their late 60s or early 70s, agreed to participate when she contacted them the next year, by then 45 years after their original testing. (Three had died since 1993 and one declined to be tested again.)

At the lab, the researchers ran the men through the same tests as before and asked about exercise routines.


Their answers revealed that, although the men remained physically active, none were competitive at this point. In general, they exercised for a few hours each week by walking, jogging or cycling.

But their fitness remained relatively outsized, she found. Each man’s VO2 max had declined significantly since 1968, when he was in his 20s and competing, and also since the second testing in 1993. But their 2013 VO2 max numbers still placed them in the top 10 percent or so of older American men, based on tables developed in recent years using cardiovascular testing data from thousands of aging people.


These findings might indicate that the former were genetically gifted, Everman says. They might be physiological outliers whose lucky cardiovascular quirks lingered into old age and allowed them to remain unusually fit in comparison to other older people.

But she is sceptical of that reading. Numerically, the men’s VO2 max levels declined more during the 45 years of the study, she says, in terms of the percentage of the capacity they lost per decade, than would be considered normal, based on data from nonathletes.

But they were declining from such a height of fitness that, even as their capacities contracted, the men’s fitness stayed above average, she says.

Such data suggest that squirrelling away fitness when we are young with sustained, frequent exercise might help to blunt some of the losses later, she says.

But the broader message of the study, she says, could be that we may need to rethink what normal fitness is or should be in older people. The tables that doctors and other experts currently use to determine “normal” fitness have been constructed with data gathered from typical older people today, many of whom have been sedentary for years.
 

© 2017 The New York Times


Let's block ads! (Why?)

Age like a former athlete

How Argentina's Diego Maradona remains undisputed king of that rugged era

Touched by God 

How We Won the Mexico ’86 World Cup

Author: Diego Armando Maradona and Daniel Arcucci

Publisher: Hachette 

Pages: 226

Price: Rs 699

Since we’re on about Mexico ’86, it would be nothing short of blasphemy to not begin with the fabled event that went on to define that World Cup. So here it is: 

It is June 22, 1986 and the match clock reads 55 minutes on a sun-soaked afternoon at Mexico City’s Azteca Stadium. In a seemingly innocuous passage of play, Diego Armando Maradona receives the ball from Hector Enrique inside his own half. England have men behind the ball; all seems well. Just then, with a balletic turn — a semi 360 of sorts — Maradona skips past Peter Reid and Peter Beardsley in one swift, mesmeric motion. Ball glued to his feet, his heels caressing the surface, he then ghosts past Terry Butcher and Terry Fenwick. A second later, Butcher thinks he has caught up with him, but the Glasgow Rangers man is just kidding himself. Maradona evades his outstretched leg and accelerates past him again. Peter Shilton comes but an unsteady Argentine captain has already blasted the ball into the net.


By now, Victor Hugo Morales, the Uruguayan journalist calling the game in Spanish, has sent the audience into chaotic paroxysms of ecstasy. “I want to cry, oh holy God, long live football! What a goal! Diegoal! Maradona! ...Little cosmic kite, which planet did you come from?” he screams. On the sidelines, Maradona is embraced by his teammates in a way a father would his long-lost son. In the crowd, they’re still rubbing their eyes in disbelief.

The events of four minutes ago already seem forgotten.


Touched by God
Moments before his amphetamine-crazed shift of feet left his opponents in a daze, Maradona had somehow risen above Shilton to miraculously punch the ball into the net. The Tunisian referee had allowed the goal to stand; it would later be dubbed the “Hand of God”.

Those four minutes succinctly captured Maradona’s entire career. He could dazzle and deceive with that same inconceivable fervour, one that forever endeared him to his fans. The England game, even by Maradona standards, was a snapshot of gripping theatre unrivalled in World Cup history. And that’s why he deserves ample credit for not making his new book, Touched By God: How We Won the Mexico ’86 World Cup, just about that. England obviously finds a mention, but never does it overshadow this outspoken and entertaining rehash of two of his previous books, El Diego and I am Diego of the People.

Flipping through its pages, you come across something about Maradona far greater than his How could that be? How could anything be possibly more powerful than his ability with the ball, or the glistening pride that swept across his face when he pulled on the white and blue of Well, there is. It’s his honesty and a fascinating impenitence that makes Touched By God so engrossing and exceptionally readable.

For the record, Maradona still hates Daniel Passarella, the man he replaced as La Albiceleste captain in the run-up to the World Cup, he’s still a part of the César Luis Menotti camp, as opposed to Carlos Bilardo’s, the coach who led them to the ’86 triumph, and if it were up to him, “he would have gone out there with a machine gun and killed Shilton, Stevens, Butcher, Fenwick… Hoddle, Beardsley, and Linekar”. It’s safe to say that Maradona, after all these years, is still Maradona: bellicose and unapologetic. 

While promoting the book, Maradona spoke about how he had revisited all the game footage from Mexico ’86, which is evident in his writing. Every memorable goal, every significant pass, every crunching tackle is recalled in a vivid, thrilling narrative that seems as recent as the woebegone 2010 campaign, which Maradona himself initially had the honour — and then the misfortune — of spearheading. 

More startling is Maradona’s brilliant culling out of football’s brutal physical age, where getting viciously kicked at for slippery ball players like him was normal, and expecting any punishment for such acts was akin to spotting polar bears in the desert.  Maradona singles out South Korea — Argentina’s first opponents in Mexico — for some savage assessment in that respect, cuss words aplenty and thrown in at will. 


Touched by God: Maradona with the World Cup trophy

Touched by God: Maradona with the World Cup trophy Photo: Reuters

Maradona’s candour also allows his cocaine use to surface. While recollecting one of his many altercations with Passarella, Maradona confesses to doing coke while on national duty. His drug use, as Paddy Agnew writes in Forza Italia: The Fall and Rise of Italian Football, started back in Barcelona in 1982-83. He only tested positive for the first time in March 1991, following a routine dope test after a league game against Bari. 

The years leading up to the fall from his exalted, status had been full of strife. Rumours of a thriving camaraderie with the Camorra, the local Naples mafia, had become routine, and parties hosted by Maradona — often involving drugs, copious alcohol and topless women — had become notorious for getting out of hand. On the field, however, he continued to weave his magic. 

At Mexico ’86, was undeniably Maradona’s team, one that he led with the skill and swagger of a nation’s darling; in the eyes of the Argentine people, he could do no wrong. And most of them would tell you that the national team at the time was a one-man artillery squad that only fired when Maradona wanted it to. That’s why Maradona warrants applause for underscoring the contributions of his teammates, some of whom played a much meatier role in the victory than many would imagine.

At the end of a brutal challenge from South Korea's Kim Yong-Se during Argentina's first group game

At the end of a brutal challenge from South Korea’s Kim Yong-Se during Argentina’s first group game Photo: Reuters

For someone who has followed Maradona — even Pelé for that matter — over the years, Touched By God throws up some familiar frailties. He is yet to fully let go of his fixation with referring to himself in third person, and all the hubris does get a bit too much in the end. More infuriatingly, the translators manage to wreck the lingo. “I scored the goal at a penalty kick at the end of the first period,” they write. Elsewhere they say, “We were winning, one to nothing, with a goal I made from a free kick. But they tied it up at the nine-minute mark…” Unlike in basketball or American football, you don’t “tie” matches in football, even though it essentially means the same thing. 

These minor quarrels, however, fail to undo the effort of Maradona who has produced a sincere, bombastic account of one the most unforgettable conquests the World Cup has ever seen. Maradona remains the undisputed king of a rugged, antiquated era untouched by the indulgences of modern And, we can only thank god that he exists.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

How Argentina's Diego Maradona remains undisputed king of that rugged era

Alcatel A3 10 tablet: Just another entry-level slate with 4G LTE support

Alcatel, backed by Chinese company TCL, a few months ago launched in India the A3 10 tablet, with 4G LTE connectivity and voice calling support, at a price of Rs 9,999. The Alcatel A3 10 is one of the few tablets offering a SIM card slot for calling and data access.

While this offers satisfactory specifications on paper, is it worth the price for real-life usage? Let’s find out.

The Alcatel A3 10 tablet houses a mammoth 10.1-inch IPS HD display with multi-touch support. The screen renders sharp colours and is bright enough for outdoor usage. The viewing angles, however, are not great, and there is a noticeable shift in colours when the screen is looked at from a certain angle.


A thickness of 8.95mm makes this 10.1-inch tablet comfortable to hold in hand and does not give a brick-like feel. However, at 465 g, it is on the heavier side, and holding it steady for long to watch videos or browse the web can be painful for your wrist.

The Alcatel A3 10 has a decent 5-megapixel camera sensor at the rear and a 2MP camera sensor at the front. Both work fine for video calling and taking random pictures for social media sharing. The rear camera takes satisfactory images with decent details and colour tone in daylight. But in low-light conditions, the camera tends to shoot blurry images with noticeable noise levels.

Powered by MediaTek MT8735B quad-core processor ticking at 1.1 GHz, the tablet offers average performance, sometimes with noticeable lags. The device comes with 16 GB of internal storage, expandable to up to 128 GB via microSD, and a 2GB RAM. It runs Android 7.0 (Nougat) out of the box with a few extra bloatware bundled in. Though there is support for 4G LTE network, the tablet does not support VoLTE services, so it is not compatible with Reliance Jio, either. In terms of battery, the Alcatel A3 10 has a 4600 mAh one which works for more than half a day. 

Verdict: The Alcatel A3 10 is an under-powered entry-level tablet, with a few goodies like voice calls and SIM-based data services thrown in. To its credit, it is better than other tablets in the budget range and works fine on most fronts.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Alcatel A3 10 tablet: Just another entry-level slate with 4G LTE support

The journey of the Nasa's voyagers

In the shadow, one might say, of the Great American Eclipse, a major anniversary in the history of exploration — and indeed cosmic consciousness — is being celebrated. It was 40 years ago, on August 20 and September 5, 1977, that a pair of robots named Voyager were dispatched to explore the outer solar system and the vast darkness beyond.

What resulted was nothing less than a reimagining of what a world might be and what strange cribs of geology and chemistry might give rise to life in some form or other.

It was a real-life Star Trek adventure, but the crew stayed home, communicating with their two spacecraft through a million-mile bucket brigade of data bits.


New computer programs went one way, and data — including scratchy photos of new landscapes and the whispering moans of interplanetary plasma fields — came back the other way. All of it was being carried out by a robot brain with the memory capacity of an old-fashioned digital watch.


The spacecraft had been designed to make what scientists called the Grand Tour, taking advantage of a once-every-175-year planetary alignment. Voyager 1 and Voyager 2 were to use the gravity of the outer planets to slingshot from Jupiter to Saturn, and to Uranus and Neptune, and then beyond the edge of the sun’s domain into interstellar

In the end, only half the tour — to Jupiter and Saturn — was actually approved. But the Voyager crew packed for a much longer journey. When they lifted off 40 years ago, the two spacecraft carried golden records inscribed with pictures and sounds from Earth, greetings from President Jimmy Carter and instructions on how to play it all.

The Voyagers would observe the universe, and give something back to whoever might one day find them.

The robot emissaries cruised the solar system through presidential administrations, wars and scandals, and the Challenger disaster, which happened as Voyager 2 was pulling away from Uranus.

At every planetfall, the crew members, a little older and a little grayer each time, reconvened at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif., for a weeklong marathon of discovery, a circus of science on the fly.

With imagery returned by probes, what had been fuzzy dots in the world’s biggest telescopes bloomed into worlds.

Back on Earth, some theoreticians claimed to be homing in on a putative theory of everything, an Einsteinian dream of an equation simple enough to be inscribed on a T-shirt. But in space, scientists were finding that such theories were no help against nature’s endless capacity to invent and surprise. Each new world revealed by the Voyagers was a head-scratcher.

Once upon a time, it was presumed that the moons of the outer planets, so far from the sun and so close to the origins of the solar system, would be boring ice balls, geologically and in every other way dead.

But then Voyager 2 spotted volcanoes spraying fountains of sulfur from the surface of Jupiter’s innermost moon, Io. On close inspection, Saturn’s rings — the jewels of the solar system — dissolved into 10,000 grooves, like a vinyl record’s, braided, kinked and patrolled by tiny moonlets.


Voyager 1 plumbed a fat, smoggy atmosphere of Titan, where nitrogen and methane rains fall on a frozen slush pile of hydrocarbons and oily lakes, and then headed off toward interstellar

Voyager 2 cruised on to Uranus, mysteriously tipped on its axis and surrounded by rings that make it look like a bull’s eye. The probe passed the restful methane blue of Neptune, besmirched by a dark spot, and its moon Triton, an ice rock flowing like soft ice cream with geysering nitrogen.

I’ve never had more fun as a science writer than during those weeklong encounters in Pasadena, when my colleagues and I — a little older and grayer ourselves, humbler but no wiser about the tricks that nature might be up to out there in the realm of dark and ice — gathered to watch the scientists watch their new worlds.

The television screens in the press room showed the latest images as they came in from the Voyager spacecraft. We had the same view as the scientists.


© 2017 The New York Times


Let's block ads! (Why?)

The journey of the Nasa's voyagers

Miss Transqueen India 2017: A gender-bending beauty pageant

As we near the end of our freedom month, a unique in Gurugram is going to celebrate a different kind of freedom. At stake is much more than the crown of — as they walk the ramp, transsexuals from across the country are hoping to break the oppressive conventions of existing beauty norms. “Through this pageant, I want the world to see that beauty comes in all the colours of the rainbow,” says Reena Rai, who has single-handedly organised this with a single sponsor — her husband, Manoj Rai. 

The finale, to be held on August 27 at the Bristol Hotel, Gurugram, will be the culmination of an arduous year-long journey of auditions, workshops and preparation for Rai and her company, Suhani Dreamcatchers. “But the finale won’t be the end,” she points out. “After we select our three finalists, we’ll groom them to participate in international pageants, perhaps even for the titles of Miss Universe and Miss World.”  


Here’s a look at some of the contestants vying for the title of Miss Transqueen 2017 (only 16 were chosen out of the 1,500 who participated in auditions held in Delhi, Mumbai and Imphal). Manipuri Khumanthem Rocky Singh is a professional makeup artist working with MAC cosmetics. from Kolkata has been a stylist at fashion website Jabong, and is presently writing an autobiography, Nitisha: The Voice of Many. Loiloi is pursuing a PhD in linguistics from Manipur University. Ragasiya Ayesha, 24, is a fashion model. And, Tanu Singh is a model from Ludhiana. For many, getting together for the finale has served as a chance to understand how similar many of their life journeys have been. 

Many have struggled to find acceptance from family and friends. Namitha, a 27-year-old model and actress from Chennai, talks about how hard it was to convince her parents that gender reassignment was imperative for her well-being. “Eventually I filed a case against them, arguing that I was a major who could independently take important life decisions,” she recalls. 


Miss Transqueen India 2017

Khumanthem Rocky Singh from Manipur is a professional make-up artist working with MAC Cosmetics

For others, like Nikki Mehta, the decision to undergo gender reassignment surgery marked a complete breakdown of relationship with their families. “I was a call centre executive in a Gurugram BPO when I decided to embrace my true gender,” says the 26-year-old. However, she faced immense discrimination afterwards. Job opportunities simply dried up. “I tried modelling,” she says, “but got no assignments.” Eventually poverty and starvation forced her into sex work. “I long to see my family back in Rishikesh,” she says, “but would only go back to them when I have achieved something. That’s why this is so important to me.” 

Miss Transqueen India 2017

Participants get their hair and make-up done before the dress rehearsals

Many of them talk about discrimination and lack of professional opportunities. “I’ve found that to get any sort of a professional career as a transwoman is not easy,” says Shivali Chhetri. “I have been a dancer for the last 12 years, adept in 20 different dance styles and yet, I find it hard to get assignments.”

Most of them, however, agree that though the process has been long and painful, transitioning as women has felt like a true homecoming. Rocky Singh says she started dressing as a girl when she moved from Imphal to Bengaluru. “People said I looked great in pants, that I had a good dress sense,” she recalls. However, it was after she changed her gender on her passport that she felt truly like herself. “Gender transition has been a liberation for me,” says She hopes that her autobiography will reach many young people who are grappling with their sexual identities. Shivali Chhetri’s transitioning has been documented in a short film, Coming out as Shivali. “I work with an NGO to council young boys who wish to undergo gender reassignment surgery,” she says.   

Miss Transqueen India 2017
For Rai, it is such stories that make the hard work organising worthwhile. “I’ve spent Rs 10 lakh from my own pocket so far,” says she. “And I expect to spend about Rs 5 lakh more.” Funding hasn’t been easy to find. “Not many think that mainstreaming sexual minorities is a worthy enough cause,” she says ruefully. Her crowd-funding page and video on Milaap.org have generated some interest, though. However, Rai has managed to get several eminent personalities on board as mentors and judges. These include fashion stylist Shaine Soni, one of the judges as well as a mentor. Others include Sushant Divgikar (Mr Gay India 2014), Gauri Sawant, transgender activist, and Hector Ravinder Dutt, psychologist and principal of Delhi Public School, Rohtak. 

“I feel that schools have a vital role to play in developing the self-confidence of adolescents who’re questioning their gender identity,” says Rai. “In fact, Dutt and I have discussed that early acceptance and support from school might prevent many transgender students from dropping out, giving them a better chance to have mainstream education and careers.” 


The very confident and poised five-member Manipuri contingent at the bears her theory out. “In our society and among our families, transgender people are easily accepted,” says Loiloi. “In fact, they’re recognised for their contributions and are given fair and equitable treatment.” Rava Khangembam, a law student points out that their state government has sponsored their travel costs. “Everyone back home wants us to show the country what we are capable of,” she says. 

Meanwhile, all the contestants have finished getting their hair and makeup done for the photoshoot. “It’s show time!” announces Soni. The girls stand up, resplendent in red chiffon, teetering on precipitously high heels. “Always tuck in your tummy when wearing chiffon,” says Soni, “it improves the silhouette.” As the camera begins to click, the contestants strike pose after pose. A girl strikes a particularly saucy pose, making Rai smile. “I want these girls to become the next Sushmita Sen or Aishwarya Rai,” she says. “If they believe they can do it, I’m confident they will.”

As I watch them pout and pirouette one minute and gather around Rai for a group hug the next (incidentally, they all call her mother), I wonder if these young women realise that they’re making history of sorts even as they redefine notions of gender and beauty. “I hope that when people see the wealth of talent among us in the finale, they might understand that gender isn’t determined by what’s between our legs,” Biswas says, her brown doe eyes welling up earnestly. Then she places her manicured hand on her heart: “Gender is what we feel up here.” 

An exhausted Rai flops on a sofa and surveys the photoshoot. “Transgenders don’t just drop out of the sky,” she says. “We give birth to them, you and I. We are their mothers, we are their fathers, sisters and brothers.” Accepting this, she says, is the first and indeed the hardest step towards empowering the third gender. 


As we listen to them talk excitedly about hair extensions, makeup and clothes, I muse that this unique has given many contestants the chance to rise above their difficult circumstances and become for the first time in their lives new queens on the ramp.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Miss Transqueen India 2017: A gender-bending beauty pageant

Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh: A larger-than-life figure whose 'crusades' made him a cult hero

This report on chief Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh, which first appeared on Business Standard on February 6, 2016, is being republished as the self-styled godman was on August 25 convicted by a CBI court in a 14-year-old rape case.



It is past 6 pm. The bright afternoon sky now has an amber tinge to it. The placid milieu of the deserted, decrepit roads is punctuated by the violent fluttering of trees. The vast mustard fields that envelop the town are quickly plunging into darkness; Sirsa, in western Haryana, is slowly cutting itself from the world.Yet, at one corner of the city, there is a bevy of anxiously waiting to catch a fleeting glimpse of Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh Ji Insan, or, as his followers like to address him, Guruji. A cavalcade of 10 cars, complete with Z-category security, breezes past. Singh, seated in the front of a ritzy green SUV, flashes a broad grin as devotees bow down with folded hands, devotion write large on their faces.

For many, this sighting of the chief is the realisation of a dream, one that will help them sleep peacefully. Gurpreet Singh, a slight man in his late 20s, tells me that this is the moment like him wait for. "Guruji has blessed me," he says with easy conviction. "Only good things will happen now."

Such is his belief in Singh that I see no point in telling him that this is precisely the stuff rationalists scoff at. In fact, none of what any detractor might say matters in Sirsa, where the Dera is headquartered.

On January 25, the birth anniversary of Shah Satnam Ji, Dera Sacha Sauda's second head and Singh's predecessor, an estimated 10 million thronged the sprawling 900-acre ashram to get satsang. Traffic snarls as long as 30 km left the town crippled.

In this part of the world, Singh enjoys the status of a larger-than-life figure whose crusades against drugs, alcohol and prostitution have made him a cult hero. As one of his followers tells me, "There is nothing that Guruji cannot do. He has the power to change everything."

Almost everyone I meet here has a story to share - an inexplicable miracle performed by Singh that helped them revive their lives. Sukhanjot Singh, 37, explains how Singh helped him evade the bullet of a terrorist when he was a teenager in a village near Amritsar. "I was hanging around my house with a couple of friends. Two gunmen came up and threatened to kill us. Guruji then magically appeared and dissuaded the terrorists from shooting at us," he claims.

Lakhvir Insan reminisces how Singh cured an enervating fever that had plagued him for two years. In 1998, soon after the recovery, he left his family in Patiala and moved to the ashram to work as a sevak. For 47-year-old Gurmel Singh, dressed in a rumpled white kurta pyjama and pink sleeveless sweater, Singh's blessings turned around his family business that was rapidly spinning into debt.

Magic is an inalienable part of religion here. It is at the root of the enormous political clout Singh enjoys and the evident prosperity.

Devotees at a Dera Sacha Sauda satsang
Giant billboards donning Singh's image appear with predictable regularity in Sirsa.

At the Dera's ashram, situated at the end of a long line of tiny houses where buffaloes are tethered out on the street, eremites are omnipresent. They look unmindful of the pale, almost morbid, green of the ashram walls.

An arid wasteland when construction began in 1992, the ashram today is a green oasis. The esplanade circumventing the satsang ground is decked with lush green grass and a clump of trees. The ground can hold thousands of people, with separate enclosures for men and women. Walls with aphorisms engraved on them are aplenty. The odd peacock dances in the backdrop.

sits inside his office amid a deluge of files and newspapers. An ophthalmologist who studied at the All India Institute for Medical Sciences, the country's premier medical college, he is the Dera's official spokesperson. He also edits Saying Truth, the Dera's official weekly paper. Sporting a maroon jacket and green woollen cap, the bespectacled starts on a defensive note.

"Here is a saint who is trying to serve society but is painted in such bad light by the media," he says. He himself claims to have been a "drunkard" who constantly chased woman till Singh bought a semblance of calm and divinity to his life. "Nobody mentions how he has transformed the lives of so many "

The Dera, in the past, has helped with disaster relief, initiated cleanliness drives, set up charitable hospitals, worked for the welfare of transgenders and encouraged organic farming. Singh, for his efforts, has 19 Guinness Book of World Records to his name, plaques of which proudly hang inside the ashram.

Controversy, however, has refused to leave his side. In 2001, he was booked for the murder of Sirsa-based journalist Ram Chander Chatrapati, who was writing about the activities of the Dera. The following year, a female follower wrote an anonymous letter to (then) prime minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee, alleging that she had been sexually abused by Singh. He has also been accused of forcibly castrating 400 followers; an act he said would take them closer to god. All matters are pending before the court.

The Dera's numbers have swelled by four times in the last few years. says that Singh enjoys such support because of his work for humanity. "If all those allegations were true, then why would flock to Sirsa in such large numbers," he asks.

At a barren field on the outskirts of the city, a cloud of dust circles the clear blue sky. A battle scene for MSG: The Warrior, the fourth instalment of the film series featuring Singh, is being shot. An army of men, brandishing swords and lances, stands in readiness as the director yells last-minute instructions. Singh is seated under a red makeshift tent at the far end of the set. Wearing a white suit of armour and a clinquant gold necklace, Singh blesses his devotees by gently waving his right hand.

Fans - or supporters - wait restlessly to spot him. Pawan Insan, a close aide of Singh, tells me that hundreds of from nearby villagers, where Singh is a father-like figure, come to see his films' shooting. Many have been lifelong supporters of the Dera.

The first two parts saw Singh ride swanky customised motorcycles in glistening attires, nonchalantly slaying the bad guys. In spite of liberal special effects, the films were brutally castigated by the critics.

The purpose of making these films, explains Jeetu Arora Insan, the man who co-directed the first two parts, is to send out a social message. "These are films trying to entertain and carry a social message at the same time. Nothing controversial," he says.

That isn't how it panned out. The first film's screening was partially stalled in Punjab after Sikh groups protested. The second part was banned in Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand for hurting the sentiments of tribes.

Still, the producers insist the two films ended up doing brisk business. Ajay Dhamija of Hakikat Entertainment, the company that produced the films, claims that the two parts made Rs 489 crore and Rs 165 crore, respectively - that's more than many Bollywood blockbusters.

"Our goal is to show the right path. And I think we managed to do that successfully in the first two films," explains Dhamija. MSG: The Warrior and MSG: Online Gurukul, the third and fourth in the series, are being shot simultaneously. Busy in the shoot, Singh was unable to spare time for an interview for this report. His rock star image, says Aditya Insaan, has been cultivated to strike a chord with the youth. "Youngsters these days only understand this language. A true guru is someone who adapts with time. And, that's what Guruji is doing," he says.

a theatre adjacent to the Sirsa ashram where Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh's films are screened

a theatre adjacent to the Sirsa ashram where Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh’s films are screened

Singh likes to try his hand at different things. His website describes him as an "actor, director, singer, composer, inventor and scientist". He is a sportsman like none other: his videos on YouTube show him hitting "eighters" in cricket matches and lifting tractors with ease. Now, he can add entrepreneur to that list as well.

Last week saw Singh launch MSG, a line of products that includes eatables, cosmetics and grocery items. MSG is an acronym for Mastana Ji, Satnam Ji and Gurmeet Singh, the three gurus to who have headed the Dera since its inception in 1948.

Chhinder Pal Arora, MSG's chairman, agrees to meet me at the one of the company's manufacturing units at Sirsa. The factory looks big, though I am not allowed inside. Dressed in a blue jacket and blue shirt, Arora says that the mission behind launching these products is to ensure that get access to unadulterated food.

Comparisons with Ramdev's Patanjali are obvious but Arora insists he is competing with no one. "Our goal is to introduce healthy, organic products at decent prices in the market. It's almost like a health campaign," he says. I happen to try one of MSG's products - a tomato-flavoured namkeen called Kadak Tadak. The taste is eerily similar to another popular product available in the market.

For now, MSG products are available in retail outlets in Sirsa and the neighbouring town of Hissar. But they seem to have made quite a frantic start. Anil Kumar, a cashier at one of the stores, tells me that a couple of products are already out of stock. "Shampoos and oils have been doing quite well. Sales should pick up even more," he says. Behind him on a shelf coated in fulgent orange, is a line of neatly-stacked bottles of MSG aloe vera gel. Arora plans to take the online route soon.

With his humongous support base, it is natural that Singh commands phenomenal political influence in the region. In 2014, just before the Haryana Assembly elections, Kailash Vijaivargiya, Bharatiya Janata Party's state chief, led a team of 40 candidates seeking his blessings. Congress candidates such as Randeep Surjewala too turned to the Dera for support.

Even as the Dera's political wing pledged its support to BJP in Haryana and later in Delhi, says that Singh himself does not pick political sides. "He chooses to be apolitical. Candidates from all parties come here to seek blessings. No one is favoured."

A local leader, who contested the 2014 Assembly elections but lost, says that Singh's influence on his followers is powerful. "He won't ask you to vote for someone. But his followers understand the sentiment," he says. "Political parties can gain hugely from such an association."

In September last year, Singh was pardoned by the Akal Takht - the highest temporal seat of the Sikhs - for dressing up like Guru Gobind Singh in Bhatinda in 2007. Political experts feel that the move was orchestrated by the Akali Dal to appease Singh who enjoys considerable clout in the Malwa region of Punjab. However, mounting pressure from Sikh hardliners and other religious groups forced the Takht to revoke the pardon the following month.

The Punjab elections next year may go a long way in determining the true compass of Singh and the Dera's influence. For now, he's just a ubiquitous portly godman, who, for his followers, is playing out the role of messenger of god.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh: A larger-than-life figure whose 'crusades' made him a cult hero

jeudi 24 août 2017

Calling all female bright sparks - this could be an alternative to sixth form

HUNDREDS of students have been waiting on GCSE results but for one, there was no panic. Calling all female bright sparks - this could be an alternative to sixth form

Oxford business woman invited to Number 10 Downing Street

OXFORD entrepreneur Joy Foster was invited to Number10 Downing Street last week. Oxford business woman invited to Number 10 Downing Street

Awards for indie startups

MAKE-UP guru Liz Earle and Dragons’ Den investor Touker Suleyman are two of the judges in a national competition. Awards for indie startups

Financial expert clears up a mystery: Oxford firm wins FT accolade

AN OXFORD accountancy firm was named Shopper’s Choice by the Financial Times earlier this month. Financial expert clears up a mystery: Oxford firm wins FT accolade

New nursery near Bicester will create jobs

A NEW children’s nursery will open on the Heyford Park housing development in Upper Heyford early next year, creating a number of jobs. New nursery near Bicester will create jobs

mercredi 23 août 2017

Terminator 2 in 3D reminds us what we've still to learn about AI, robotics

The classic science fiction action film Terminator 2: Judgment Day has ticked over its 25th anniversary. To celebrate, director went one step further than remastering the original 1991 version and has re-released the film in 4K 3D, in cinemas now.

Who let the killer out again? StudioCanal

T2 tells the story of two sent back in time from the future, one (the T800, “living tissue over metal endoskeleton”, in Arnold Schwarzenegger’s most iconic role) to protect the future leader of the human resistance; the other (the T1000, a more advanced, shapeshifting liquid metal model) sent to terminate him.

In this 1995 timeline, the boy is a ten-year-old (Edward Furlong), protected by his mother (Linda Hamilton), who has toughened up a lot since being the target of a failed time-travel assassination in the first Terminator film (a “pre-emptive” abortion since John was not yet born at that time)

But how plausible are the physics and science behind some of the film’s incredible scenes, and what light does modern artificial intelligence and robotics research shed on the film, 25 years on?

There will be spoilers, so if you haven’t seen the film already, go see it in cinemas this week - and then make sure that you’ll be back here to read on.

Shooting Terminators

When a near-indestructible cyborg is hellbent on killing you and you’re in the United States of America, there’s only one way to defend yourself: with guns. T2 is filled with amazing action scenes where these metal monsters go toe to toe with each other and the humans that get in their way.

Director referred to Arnold’s T800 Terminator model as a sort of Panzer Tank, in contrast to the liquid metal T1000 being more like a sleek Porsche.

Like any military tank, Terminators would potentially be vulnerable to sheer momentum transfer knocking them off their feet, even if bullets weren’t able to damage their endoskeleton directly. This is very different to humans, to whom bullets often do most of their damage via energy transfer rather than momentum transfer.

The T800 first gets shot at the shopping mall by the T1000, who unloads a magazine of 9x19mm handgun ammunition into Arnie’s back. With a muzzle velocity of about 380m/s and a bullet weight of 7.45 grams, each bullet has a maximum momentum P of:

P = mass × velocity = mv

= 0.00745kg × 381m/s

= 2.838kgm/s

Assuming that all the momentum is transferred to the T800, it will change the momentum of the T800 by a certain amount: we can call this “Delta P” or “DP” for short. We can then work out what velocity each bullet would normally impart, which we’ll refer to as “Delta V”, or “DV” for short.

First we need a weight for the T800, which is never stated. But it can ride a motorcycle fine - so we can guesstimate a weight of 200kg:

DV = DP / m

= 2.838 / 200

= 0.01419m/s

= 0.05109km/hr

So each bullet would only impart a miniscule amount of velocity change to the T800 - so it being able to shrug them off effortlessly is entirely reasonable.

Verdict: plausible.

Later in the film, an entire police and SWAT team unloads on Arnold and he appears to get shaken around a bit more. Let’s repeat the calculation, for a team of ten shooters each emptying a 30-round AR-15 magazine firing 5.56x45 4gram bullets at a muzzle velocity of 975 m/s. We’ll do the calculation as if he gets hit by ten bullets at a time:

P = Number of bullets × mv

= 10 × 0.004kg × 975m/s

= 39 kgm/s

So:

DV = 39 / 200

= 0.195m/s

= 0.7km/hr

In terms of relative effect, that’s more than an order of magnitude more than the lone handgun, so the T800 being knocked around a bit by the combined fire is reasonable.

Verdict: plausible.

manages to knock the T1000 back a sizeable amount with single shotgun blasts in the final showdown at the steel mill. We don’t need to perform any calculations to show this is implausible. For each shot should feel the same momentum effects as the T1000 that is struck.

While she has the benefit of being braced for the shot, it’s still unlikely the T1000 would be knocked through the air an entire metre, unless it weighed much much less than a human. This also happens in the first T800 vs T1000 showdown, where single shots from Arnie’s shotgun throw the T1000 all over the place.

Verdict: implausible.

Code Cracking

Early in the film, a young is shown supporting himself by cracking ATM PIN codes using an early portable computer (an Atari Portfolio).

He appears to use a brute force attack, trying all possible PIN combinations. Even on that early 1990s computer tech, the number of combinations required is quite small. Each digit has ten possibilities, and there are four digits:

Number of combinations = options per digitNumber of digits

= 104

= 10,000

The computer appears to zip through the possibilities quickly, so it’s plausible that all 10,000 combinations could be tried in a few seconds (assuming his hack was also stopping any “lock out” security mechanism which stopped you after a few incorrect tries).

Verdict: plausible.

A learning Terminator

One of the deleted scenes in involved John and deciding to reboot the T800’s Central Processing Unit (CPU) to enable it to learn and hence give them a fighting chance against the T1000.

This scene is highly relevant to the technological revolution that deep learning has caused over the past five years, where major advances in artificial intelligence have been made using large neural networks that learn about the world.

The ability of robots and AIs to learn from real world experience has been critical to many recent developments.

Verdict: highly plausible.

Wrong performance goals

The backstory to T2 is that a human-created artificial intelligence called Skynet starts learning at an amazing rate. Humans panic, try to shut it down, and it reacts by launching nukes at Russia, which in turn launches its own nukes back.

In the ensuing nuclear aftermath, Skynet builds an army of killer and flying Hunter-Killer robots to enslave the remnants of humanity.

Setting appropriate boundaries for intelligent, autonomous systems is a part of Trusted Autonomous Systems research, which is a big focus of effort in today’s push towards increasingly autonomous defence systems.

It’s possible Skynet was reacting exactly as it should have, based on how it was set up, to defend against all attacks. Today’s military planners must be careful to fully understand the potential unintended consequences of all the performance goals they set for their high tech autonomous systems.

Verdict: highly plausible, designers must very carefully set objectives for AI systems.

Terrific or Terminal?

is a classic sci-fi action film filled with action that often but not always pays heed to the laws of physics. Its re-release in 4K 3D takes what is already a visually impressive film and ramps it up another notch.

The Conversation logo

But it is in T2’s addressing of key concepts that are incredibly important today - artificial intelligence, the importance of learning, the ability of a machine to learn the value of human life and the danger of unintended technological consequences, that it particularly shines.

The ConversationWhile it will always be a part of film history, its legacy is perhaps increasingly becoming its use as a focal point for almost all discussion about robotics, artificial intelligence and their role in humanity’s future. And for that, it gets an A+ for scientific importance. 


Michael Milford, Professor, Queensland University of Technology

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

The Conversation

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Terminator 2 in 3D reminds us what we've still to learn about AI, robotics

Raghuram Rajan comes back with I Do What I Do

Exactly a year after leaving the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) as its governor, is coming out with a new book containing his commentary and speeches. According to HarperCollins India, which is the publisher of the book, it would offer “a front-row view” of his tenure at the central bank in “those turbulent but exciting times”. The book is titled I Do What I Do.

Priced at Rs 699, the book is available for pre-order at a discount of 24-25 per cent on and

Rajan had said in his last days at the that he won’t be engaging in public discourse for a year after leaving the central bank. The book is being launched after completion of that period. It would be formally launched in Chennai on September 5 and then in New Delhi and Mumbai. Rajan is expected to be present in the launch programmes. 

The book takes its name from Rajan’s famous quote on September 29, 2015 policy, when the had cut rates by half a percentage point, surprising many. 

In that policy, he was asked if he was to gift the economy a larger than expected rate cut. Rajan responded in his customary wittiness: “I don’t know what you want to call me... .. you want to call me hawk, I don’t know. I don’t go by this. My name is and I do what I do,” he said. 

In his three-year tenure between September 4, 2013 and 2016, Rajan carried the same attitude, often leading to his awkward contrarian takes on important government narratives of the day. 

Rajan had taken over at a time when the Indian rupee had hit its lifetime low of 68.87 on August 28, 2013. Rajan’s predecessor Subbarao decided to use Rajan’s personality and international reputation to halt the rupee slide. And on September 4 evening, as soon as he took over as the governor, Rajan announced a slew of measures to reform the ailing Indian financial system, including urgent cleaning up of bank balance sheets and introducing a special dollar deposit scheme for overseas Indians. 

The rupee bounced back and ever since then, has been strong, stable, and range bound. 


A press release by HarperCollins India mentions Rajan’s emotions on assuming the responsibility of governorship. “The rupee stops here. Right here!” — a play on the phrase “The buck stops here”.   

“Rajan’s commentary and speeches in I Do What I Do convey what it was like to be at the helm of the central bank in those turbulent but exciting times,” the publisher’s statement said. 

And then the release states Rajan’s addresses on “key issues that are not in any banking manual but essential to growth: the need for tolerance and respect to assure India’s economic progress, for instance, or the connection between political freedom and prosperity.”


The issues have been spoken or written by Rajan during his tenure at

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Raghuram Rajan comes back with I Do What I Do